Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
The ultimate question of philosophy…
“"Should I kill myself, or have a cup of coffee?”
-Camus
Teach critical thinking skills as a pillar of the school curriculum and the population will be immunized preventing the spread.
Fists aren’t a cure to intolerance. Probably doesn’t hurt so knock yourself a nazi out. As long as force isn’t being used to prevent open discussion and debate, it would be most unwise to drive dangerous ideologies underground where they can’t be monitored and understood.
Why did 2 break up with zero?
Some 1 got between them!
Okay… And if you stand by your morals, more power to you. For me, it’s a worthwhile trade forfeiting my data (usually anonymised anyways) for the convenience of their free services.
I’m not ignorant. Any one who isn’t aware of where G’s revenue comes from has been living under a rock. The choice is clear, and if Google is making that even more obvious, I think that’s a good thing.
Keep fighting the good fight, but the majority of us will keep using google because these *exclusive scoops shouldn’t be a revelation to anyone.
Okay. So who is keeping tally? Does the side with the least war crimes win or something?..
Half the population are children, most of whom will dedicate their life to a blood feud.
Wait, that’s a real thing? I thought it was just a marketing stunt!
To someone who can’t be bothered doing any independent research, this sounds the most likely.
So every time you buy a coffee you’re actively killing a starving child? Struth!
Well, there are 5 governments you should be concidering. Or is it 8? Might be 12 by now…
Agreed but the puritans that have to give it up before we can expect sites like this to overexpose themselves to legal action.
proofs of idiocy and/or bad faith they offer
Then a downvote is justified, same user or not.
There’s nothing in the legislation that prevents the (predominantly white European) government from continuing to cherry pick. We don’t need another excuse to be apathetic about indigenous issues.
Either way, some of us whities just don’t feel comfortable determining the future of indigenous people.
F in the chat for victims of the Great Oxygenation Event.
That’s… not relevant to my point at all.
Make it apple employees in store and Microsoft forums. If humans give bad advice 10% of the time and Ai (or any technological replacement) makes mistakes 1% of the time, you can’t point to that 1% as a gotcha.