Right, but if you bring it up in a discussion forum, expect people to discuss it.

Thanks Mr. Betteridge

Management jobs are rarely union, since they’re the ones making the rules.

Just give them access to it now? There shouldn’t be any issue with it continuing to be available or a while if you should get hit by a bus.

primebuy looks like a ripoff of amazon, insight looks legit, but you’ll probably get what your order from either site

It’s effectively a sentient weapon that will attack people.

Well, yes, that’s the point. But not specifically people, but any animal coming into the territory, like wolves, coyotes, or foxes, that might kill livestock.

Anything in the Jellyfin logs?

Now? The writing was on the wall years ago. Support has already taken a nosedive, and they’ve basically all but stopped selling anything except to the biggest customers.

You should consider opnsense instead of pfsense in any case.

Yeah, loss leader probably isn’t the right term for those.

Isn’t that basically what Trump has been doing since day one?

Yes, it’s surprising when a loss leader leads to losses. For example, Olive Garden and their soup, salad, and bread sticks are probably loss leaders because of how cheap they are, but they make up that little loss with much better margins on entrees (and, I assume, drinks).

https://www.politico.eu/article/united-ireland-look-more-likely-brexit-study-uk-belfast/

I would not, and I’m not sure why. Maybe because I differentiate between living and nonliving things for some reason? I would say the lions’ cage, for example. Actually, unless I was contrasting it, I would say “the lion cage”, regardless of the number of lions it houses, but that might just be a fixed expression in English regarding zoos and such. I would not say dry goods’ pantry or pants’ drawer.

You don’t have to have legal ownership of a thing to use the possessive. “Migrants’ shelter” is fine, and I would say preferred.

Cantaloupe is like honeydew, except it also has flavor!

What are you using for a drive controller?

In this specific instance, the staff and patients may have been intimidated.

He sounds like one of the few good Christians these days.

The Constitutional protection from double jeopardy does not apply across jurisdictions. You can be tried in state and federal court for the same act, and in military court too, if applicable.

In practice, this doesn’t usually happen, you get tried and convicted in one or the other for a single crime. However, you may be tried for different crimes committed in the same act, for example by committing a hate crime, you may be charged by the state government for the act, plus a federal civil rights charge.

And then the court martial will probably say “yeah you’ve already been convicted and you’re going to civilian jail, here’s your dishonorable discharge, get the fuck out”. Unless you did something really messed up and the military wants their pound of flesh too.