They did in the beginning for a limited amount of time: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67051292 They relented to trickling some food and water thorugh because of international pressure.

In a war you usually target soldiers and evacuate civilians. I don’t think, that there are many wars, where one side was able to block all access to food and drinkable water.

Did you expect more from the headline? Journalism at its best…

Specific genres are awesome to find new bands, that you like, because they sound similar. If I like power metal and you recommend me Behemoth, because I like metal, your suggestion has no value for me, while I probably would like another power metal band like Blind Guardian.

Yeah, that’s getting even worse.

Well since we are at anecdotal evidence. I am in the academics bubble, where quite a few of my friends also got children and they love it. You don’t like kids, so you see all the problems that come with having children. You are looking for confirmation bias. There are more than enough people that do not hate children. I mean, we are kinda biologically programmed to procreate.

Countries in Europe got most of that and they are still struggling with getting to the replacement rate.

Europe got both, we are still below replacement rate.

The information you get might be biased, because people love to vent about bad stuff, but do not mention the rewarding stuff, that makes it worth it.

No, it’s actually bad for everyone, because few young people have to support loads of old people. Politics will cater to the old people, because they have more voting power in numbers and will cut budgets for young people (education, social security and so on).

It’s also that people do not need a lot of children anymore, so that some survive to take care of them, when they’re old.

Are you not able to buy vegetables, fruits, pasta, rice, beans and so on in your local supermarket?

Well, these governments obviously were not right enough. A real right wing party will fix all the problems! \s

And that’s relevant enough for the headline of the article?

In German state media a comment was printed, that basically said “Israel is a democracy and so they won’t commit any war crimes. And if they do, there will be consequences afterwards”. It was an awful read, basically giving Israel free reign.

The whole discussion started for winter conditions. You can find the numbers in the other comment thread.

1l/h as I noted further down. Still less range lost relative to the maximal range than in an EV.

The answers to your question is already in my post and the 150 was obviously a typo, because the loss in range checks out. It should be 15. AC uses less because the temperature difference is less.

From cooling the engine. When you are standing still and the engine is running it consumes about 1l/h. I just looked up some numbers for EVs: 100kWh battery, heating takes 1kW for every 10K temperature difference, so 3kWh in -10°C. Its higher if you use additional stuff like the heating for the seats. With 150kWh/100km consumption you lose 20km every hour you are in the heated car. I would say that’s a noticeable difference compared to no heating. I also checked how much an AC takes in summer and its about 1 to 2kW for 30°C.

That’s why I said it depends on the type of the heat pump. Some can go really low, the cheaper ones not. At some point (the latest at -273.15C :D) they need to switch.