Please keep posting the screenshots. I live in the EU and they haven’t brought this"feature" here.
Please keep posting the screenshots. I live in the EU and they haven’t brought this"feature" here.
Good read. Makes sense and not even that complex, good that they did this experiment anyway just to prove it out to those less technical and try to get prevention steps out there.
Technically AMD also offers an open Vulkan driver (AMDVLK), it’s just dog shit, and an open compute driver (Rocm), its just also bad, and an open OpenGL driver (Radeonsi), which is solid.
Those three are all primarily developed by AMD engineers and are fully open. Nvidia has no such open equivalents.
Uhh nvidia has had native Linux drivers since the 1990’s…
The web UI was also vastly superior to Hotmail or Yahoo
Yes, and? That reinforces what I’m saying. As long as they don’t install the cookies, the user can browse the site without seeing the banner. Therefore if the user blocks the banner, they can’t install the cookies, that doesn’t mean they can’t show the user the site.
Not sure what’s hard to understand here.
No, it doesn’t. The banner is only needed for you to accept the cookies. It’s completely fine to just block the banners or not show them, just the user can’t accept the cookies, so CNN can’t use them.
CNN would rather block the user than lose out on the chance to save those cookies.
It’s ok, you can’t catch all the details when you’re speeding by in the left lane the entire time
More like one using a faulty autopilot
Yeah, but contrast that with the PS controllers that have an official driver in the kernel written and maintained by Sony employees. It’s a world of difference in official support.
Firefox isn’t based on WebKit. Maybe you’re thinking Safari.
Who’d have guessed a Microsoft hardware product works like garbage in Linux.
Agreed, was meh until then but the punchline was worth it.
My VW-built EV seems pretty high quality. China and USA aren’t the only game in EVs.
Samsung isn’t building their phones in South Korea anymore?
You don’t need secure boot to use EFI. It’s better all around regardless of SB.
What’s the difference between the court saying it’s defamation, and thus illegal to publish and worthy of awarding damages, and ordering it taken down? Seems like splitting hairs.
Nobody is buying $50 drives for a datacenter. What matters here is how this compares with 16TB+ sizes.
Isn’t this standard everywhere? I know it’s like this in the Netherlands. I assume in America they give you the bald eagle feathers per egg or something too.
*Ik ben