Formerly @ZeroCool@feddit.ch
It’s satire. Despite the community being called The Onion, articles from all satire sites are allowed. See the sidebar for an (incomplete) list of links.
I return your pettiness to you. Bye now. 👋
lmao oh no! Anyway…
lol okay pal, that’s enough of you. Bye now. 👋
I don’t think that’s a reasonable ask
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/facetious
“hands would be magenta” my guy you probably shoulda googled that word before committing to it.
Magenta is a purple-ish red color which on it’s own doesn’t really work as a reference to blood, but the author chose that specific color because it’s also the name of Blue’s friend next door, a dog named Magenta.
https://bluesclues.fandom.com/wiki/Magenta
Perhaps you should’ve googled that before committing to your comment?
I’ll be sure to forward that video to thehardtimes.net. Hopefully they’ll tease the ghost of Carl Sagan equally to settle any concerns of unfair treatment.
If that’s what you took away from this you’re an idiot.
Well you gave us an example of an “acceptably political” game so why didn’t you include an example of one that you think missed the mark? Surely, that was an innocent, if embarrassing, oversight… Right? “Gee wiz, I forgot to support half my argument! Shucks!”
I mean, I do have RGB lights but it’s not because I’m a software engineer. I’m just a dork.
“My secret santa match said they like onions… I’m never doin’ this shit again, redditors are weird.” - That person, probably
deleted by creator
Yes, cutting the CEO’s pay won’t prevent layoffs. Excellent work, detective. That was definitely the aim of my comment and not a simple matter of principle.
“We have ambitious goals and will be investing in our big priorities this year,” Pichai told all Google employees on Wednesday in an internal memo that was shared with me. “The reality is that to create the capacity for this investment, we have to make tough choices.”
Surely Alphabet will make the tough choice to cut CEO pay, right? lololololol I crack myself up sometimes…
Yep, it’s a terrible argument but it’s the only one they’ve got. They can’t admit the easier it is to cancel service the more customers they’ll lose. Nor can they say that the cable industry has spent a fortune researching how to make canceling service just frustrating enough that people will put it off long enough for the urge to eventually pass. And believe it or not, exploiting people’s laziness has been a surprisingly effective customer retention strategy for decades.
“The proposed simple click-to-cancel mechanism may not be so simple when such practices are involved. A consumer may easily misunderstand the consequences of canceling and it may be imperative that they learn about better options,” NCTA CEO Michael Powell said at the hearing. For example, a customer “may face difficulty and unintended consequences if they want to cancel only one service in the package,” as “canceling part of a discounted bundle may increase the price for remaining services.”
This sounds like a “you” problem. If your service were any good this wouldn’t be a concern because nobody would have a reason to reach that page. Take those discounted bundles and fuck right off.
Standard Lemmy reply mentioning Kagi is great if you’re willing to pay for a search engine.
Standard Lemmy Counter point recommending StartPage.
“It’s spellduh GAZPACHO u big dum fake knews jornulusts” - Marjorie Taylor Greene