If they spend 50k on a videogame, then they have 50k to spend by definition, whether or not it’s actually their money. If it’s not actually their money, then I have even less sympathy.

I’ll give another example. I have a lot of sympathy for opiate addicts. I have zero sympathy for opiate addicts who steal from their friends and family.

Nah, if you’re going to hide your bad choices behind clinical language, then you need therapy. If you’re not getting therapy and you have 50k to spend, then that’s a you problem.

Meh my sympathy only runs so far.

This is Russia’s final warning!

From another comment in this thread, at least in the US, it looks like it actually is approved for treatment of ADHD. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/005378s028lbl.pdf

Isn’t Adderall basically meth? Is there a difference in how they would affect ADHD symptoms at low dose?

How will they make you scared and obedient if the ancient enemy is defeated? They’ll have to make up alien invasions or some shit if Russia loses too hard.

Our next innovation will allow you to work 48 hours per day!

Mac os

That’s a great reason! Why use a computer at all if you can’t look cool while you use it?

From reading all of these comments, I think I have to agree. It seems like systemd as “the tool” is ok (I know there’s some argument there too), but systemd as the project and ecosystem seems to go a bit against the soul of GNU and Unix.

My question was just curiosity. If there’s a good reason to switch to something else, I’d like to know, you know?

Ah ok. Is that different for runit or the other typical alternatives?

Can someone persuade me to not use systemd without using the word ‘bloat?’

To the pillory!

Just one of the most famous bank heists ever.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norrmalmstorg_robbery

If a bank robber takes hostages, do you order an air strike on the bank?

And it only took 4,000 dead children to get him. Yay!

Which is to say, Chinese. But the Chinese are not too keen on Russia’s war and have so far resisted escalating it, so I think this was probably accidental.

Good question. I didn’t know about decltype. I guess they are slightly different in that decltype will also produce a type reference. Typeof just produces the type, even if you call on a reference.