Non-binary computer witch.

ネットワーク内部から来ています。

 

¡ACHTUNG!

May contain thoughts and opinions

Viewer digression is advised

http://9p.sdf.org/~bubstance/
mailto:bubstance@9p.sdf.org
openpgp4fpr:5e057c319b634f422db8267189ba712e2779375b
  • 1 Post
  • 20 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 6th, 2024

help-circle
  • I use it because it’s truly a “complete system” in a way that Linux and even the BSDs are not—every program is an example in itself and it comes with a ton of various scratch-built utilities that you don’t usually find as part of a typical Linux distro. Stuff like a basic torrent or IRC client just sort of fall out of the way Plan 9 is organized and implemented.

    It also provides me with a distraction-free environment and a set of tools that I enjoy using, even if some aspects of Plan 9 as, say, a laptop daily driver are inconvenient or awkward. It really is better suited for networked computing.

    I was pretty much sold from first contact because Plan 9 is the way that I feel best matches what I’ve always wanted from my machines: a simple grid of networked appliances where I can route the various resources and hardware in whatever way I require.








  • bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOPtoUnixporn@lemmy.ml[rio] Plan 9 is not UNIX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Oh sure, lots of things are “inconvenient” on Plan 9.

    Of note for most would-be users: if you rely on a modern web browser like Firefox/Chrome, forget about it. Never going to happen.

    It’s important to remember that Plan 9 is fundamentally a research operating system; it’s not really a “typical” environment by any stretch, and that stems largely from it being entirely network-based and distributed. A single Plan 9 system in isolation can only be so interesting. Using it on a laptop like this can be an entirely different set of problems.

    If you’d like some examples of things you may face:

    • booting can be slow

    • can be intimidating to set up for some of the more important features – factotum(4) and secstore(1), new users and directories under /, etc.

    • cwfs is slow

    • hjfs is really slow

    • no multi-monitor support

    • only recently did we get a filesystem that specifically aims to be crash-safe

    • poor documentation, though it’s been getting better

    • reading research papers is basically a requirement for understanding the system

    • security is not a priority

    For me, though? I genuinely don’t need much more than what’s available in the base system.














  • It sounds like Gentoo is literally exactly what you want.

    I am currently not using gentoo, and because the packages in its default repos are only updated when necessary, and the break-my-gentoo repo is more of a joke than an actual replacement for arch.

    I’m sorry, but I am genuinely confused here.

    Gentoo can be both stable and bleeding edge and allows you to mix and match on a per-package basis.

    Does setting ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" globally not make things bleeding edge enough for you? Grab *-9999 packages instead.