![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
What makes it more of a minefield than email?
What makes it more of a minefield than email?
First of all a properly seasoned cast iron pan can and should be washed with modern dishwashing liquid. If the seasoning comes off with 'hand friendly ’ soap it was garbage seasoning anyway.
Second, this looks perfectly ready for seasoning. Nothing wrong with that. Just get the outdoor grill going grab some short chain oil and get to work.
An economy only works when a majority participates. An ideal economy has everyone participating.
You can do a basic thought experiment to figure this out. Imagine 10 people control $100 trillion. Everyone else controls $0. What do you think you’ll be able to get for $1?
You might then say, “money isn’t wealth.” True. But if 10 people control all the wealth and everyone else has starved to death that’s even worse.
Capping the amount of wealth anyone can inherit seems sane to me. In fact it seems healthy for the whole economy, so not just sane but prudent. If you let all the wealth be collected by a few the system breaks down and all the money becomes worthless. Preventing that is entirely sane.
I’m against preventing the transfer all all property. That seems like a recipe for corruption but I’d vote for limiting it to a trust of like $50-$100 million maximum plus an occupied home, a vacation home, and some reasonable amount of small property like boats and cars. Honestly that amount seems excessive to me but I think the majority would be in favor of such a law.
What makes you think this opinion will die on the Internet?
Does not check out. My espresso machine is the mirror image of the one in this meme but I use Fedora.
++ Totally. 10€ a month can’t be close to the value of the data. If the cost was actually based on the value of the data it might be a valid choice.
I’m still curious where coercion comes into it?
You choose to visit Facebook. They’ve always provided services funded by your data. Now you get to choose between that model or compensating them directly.
Where does the coercion come in?
PS, I hate Facebook and don’t use it in case that matters somehow.
Who are we paying these interest payments to? Retirement accounts? Billionaires? Other countries?
What do you change after a clean Windows install? I used to have a script that would turn everything off but it doesn’t work anymore.
Google search and assistant quality has dropped quite a bit over the last few years. Even so I have the best experience with their ecosystem. Apple, Amazon, and Samsung just aren’t as flexible and feel worse to use.
I’m not sure how to read this report. It says my browser is unique and random with strong protections.
Wait… you would get behind ruining Wikipedia just so you wouldn’t have to see fundraising banners when you use it?
Thanks for the civil discussion. While my views haven’t changed I have learned a lot about possible objections from informed people.
Let’s hope this new auth standard is implemented responsibly by all the major parties and that weak passwords and phishing become relics of the past.
But that’s the whole thing we are trying to solve here. We are trying to eliminate human factor and by extension bad habits people have when it comes to security. So expecting people to use good passwords and pins for keys will be the same as expecting people to have good passwords for accounts. Perhaps even worse because of claims it’s better security so people might even relax more.
I feel like it’s 2001 and I’m trying to convince my users to switch from passwords to RSA keys for SSH. Yes there are potential weaknesses. Yes it’s still much better.
Also timeouts with pins and passwords mean very little once someone has your device. This is why I don’t consider it good two-factor. PIN might be in your head, but nothing is preventing someone brute forcing it. Once you image the device you can do whatever you want. With credit cards, you’d need ATM to keep doing it and lockout is a serious problem there.
Even if all we’ve done is reduced potential attackers from everyone with an Internet connection to people with physical access to the device we’ve still massively increased the average user’s security. And we’ve done more than that.
Also unless you can clone the device somehow hitting max guesses and losing access just like an ATM is part of the design.
It’s a step in right direction for sure, but I’d prefer if keys didn’t depend on PIN or password.
I lost track of your suggestion over the weekend but what was your suggestion for second factor other than a pin or password?
Kinda. Given that nobody else supported it Google dropping it did sort of kill it. Passkeys are very different as they are already supported by Apple, Microsoft, and scads of smaller companies.
True. In the context of this thread it doesn’t matter though.
You link to articles about law enforcement hacking phones to get data as a reason not to use biometrics? If they are hacking your device it doesn’t matter if you use a password or a fingerprint.
ircCloud because my self hosted push notifications were failing and it worked right away.
Irssi before I started depending on push notifications though.