Glistening.

You maybe have ADHD, but you and also OP probably also have a bunch of other stuff that may or may not be diagnosed that explains all those symptoms.

Don’t be like that. It’s just that if you work that hard on food, have someone else enjoy it enough to want to do the dishes each time. And always have a dishwasher (the appliance), so it’s easy.

Don’t even get me started. Cooking is my love language. I’ll work from 9-5, the start cooking at 5:30 to have dinner on at 7:30 for my family.

It’s fun and enjoyable. It’s a form of meditation. I like to drink while I do it. Its a way to practice skill mastery outside of my normal job. I’m a foodie myself who can’t quite afford to eat at Michelin star restaurants every night but appreciate that level of cuisine.

I’m mastering the French sauces, the Asian stir fries, the curries, American BBQ. I’m my biggest critic and my greatest benefactor. Nothing reminds me that life is good quite like setting down a meal that I’m pretty sure could get a Michelin star to my family and enjoying it together.

1. Eat slower than 10 minutes. My God have some company over. If you’re spending 2 hours cooking there’s no way doubling the recipe takes much longer.

2. Make the company or your significant other do the dishes. If you’re in a situation where you’re cooking for two hours then doing the dishes yourself, something is wrong.

You don’t have to consent to becoming a gay folk hero.

You’re talking sheer pregmatics here? Awesome, now you’re speaking my language.

Celebrate her relationship. Turn her into a gay folk hero for hooking up with women despite the upbringing / programming.

I’m not saying it’s a debate, just be the change you want to be. If we sex shame them, we’re saying they’re right to be doing the same.

Try being the change you want to see. Celebrate their relationship.

Your first sentence, you state it’s not an appeal to hypocrisy, then you define hypocrisy in the same sentence.

The issue is not discriminating against the rights of others while giving yourself those same rights. The issue is discriminating. Period. There’s no other caveots there.

If you’re going to sex shame them, you’re just as bad as them. Let’s celebrate their sexuality instead.

Then your last sentence, “it is better to use a fallacy to force them to think logically”. C’mon what the fuck are you even saying? It’s self defeating since you’re already not thinking logically if you’re using fallacies. You’re talking about FORCING SOMEONE TO THINK? You are just as bad as them.

So what? We don’t judge people for their sexuality. Challenges of hypocrisy are ad hominem.

Their views and politics are trash no matter what they like to do in the bedroom. If we can’t be better…

Hard disagree. If a child is committing crimes it’s is 100% the parent’s fault. Charging the kid is actually fucked up. I don’t think it should just be a fine. If a kid does something jailable, they parents should be jailed.

When it becomes one click to see the chick across from you naked, tell me how many 16 year old boys won’t. You are far too naive to be having this conversation.

It’s not illegal to to work on, sell, or distribute the models. And making that illegal is what the first commenter said would be dangerous to do, since then regular people wouldn’t be able to compete with corporation’s abilities.

Once the models and portable hardware are good enough, and it’s just a matter of time, I think you’re underestimating how ubiquitous it will become.

Every teenage boy will have a pair of nudie glasses in the form of their smartphone running open source models, and you think they’re just going to not use them?

It’s probably a bit of an exaggeration, but my point stands. It’s going to be so easy for anyone to see ai gen material of anyone else, no one is going to care anymore.

I don’t think you’re properly understanding the paradigm shift that’s coming with these models being open source and widely available while wearable AR smart glasses get better.

“You know Sharon is HR, look at this scandalous photo of her.”

“Uh, I’m seeing a live generated porno of everyone in this room right now, why would I care about that.”

Like what? Why share something when anyone curious to see it can instantly generate their own?

You conceded that no one cares if someone makes images locally then deletes them. But that’s how they’re all going to be made shortly.

Currently folks are sharing them because not everyone has the means to create them, some folks do, and share what they’ve made.

Once litterally every can just make them the moment they want to, no one will be sharing. Everyone will fall under that use case that you admitted no one would care about, which is exactly what I’ve been saying. It’s 1. futile to try to stop, and 2. going to become so wide spread that we as a society will stop caring about it.

Because it burns you. That’s the answer. It kills your skin cells and eyes the same way it kills the bacteria. Also, it is everywhere, it’s fucking outside. The sun. Fucking stupid. Idiots.

Know what else kills bacteria? Bleach. So get chugging.

So stupid.

If everyone could create their own, and just run it locally, explain how the laws could be enforced?

There isn’t ways to limit certain models without limiting all AI tech, which is what the first comment above from another user was saying. That corporations want to be the only ones using it by keeping it out of the hands of regular people, and this plays into that.

Something this powerful should absolutely be democratized, we should all have our own open source models, and unfortunately that means those smart glasses the guy on the bus is wearing could be undressing everyone in real time.

There’s nothing to be done about it, and trying to do something is worse. It’s like the war on drugs. Folks who want to do it are gonna do it. Fighting it is only going to make the world worse. Unfortunately there are victims here, but societally I think we’re just going to have to get over it.