No problem.
🤖bleep bloop 🤖 bleep bloop 🤖
Usually a reload does the trick. That’s a lemmy thing. Infosec.pub is rock solid and reliable.
I posted a link to legendary hardcore punk band, Dag Nasty. 🤘🏽
You should look into RISC-V as well. Someone posted something about a formally-verified OS that runs on an fpga emulation of risc v. it’s called lion. Super interesting stuff and some among us figure it could be a foundation for an end-to-end formally verified machine. Perhaps virtually zero attack surface area…
Of course!..especially as it pertains to decentralized exchange of information and grass-roots activisim and legal civil disobedience. I can, for example, think of many applications for LoRa with regard to darknet nodes, etc.
Perhaps the cynical side of me would argue that you have to start from a place of righteous idealism and work your way backward. I’m old enough to know that nothing much will change but I’m also tech savvy enough to realize that we’re in the golden age of being able to create open source tools and software that enable more freedom and safety from tyranny than any other time in history.
Also, I’d appreciate someone who wants to play devil’s advocate. I’m often overly exuberant about ideas and I need someone to tell me what I’m missing.
No pressure! I have so many more links and ideas to share. The fediverse is the perfect place for this kind of idealogical shift. If we can co-opt the tribalist information delivery mechanisms of mainstream media and centralized social media, we have a chance to provide people with the knowledge they need to become better, more prepared citizens of the world.
deleted by creator
Joke’s on you! This is a post with the logo from my favorite niche sub.
dotfiles or it didn’t happen, OP!
I can see why they did it. World is far too ubiquitous to be responsive. I have a harder time interacting with world than any other instance.
I disagree. I think profit seeking makes sense for certain tools. However, I don’t think it makes sense here.
Now, if someone were to create a subscription based version of activitypub which would attempt to decentralize the Netflix business model, I could see tying profit motives into the whole system. The system would ideally dole out proceeds proportional to the viewership of each title. Now THAT would make sense. Charging people for your video streaming software doesn’t, IMO.
Why are they even a company in the first place? They make an app that should objectively not be tied to profit-seeking.
Dear venture capitalist shitbags: get your money grubbing fingers off of technologies (like Reddit) that are objectively worse when tied to profit-seeking motives.
Wake me up when they switch to RISC-V.