Not everything is the worst. Just the important things.
It’s just a murder of crows, coming up slow.
Not everything is the worst. Just the important things.
Thanks. It sounds like fusion centers will still be a viable workaround, but it’s not entirely clear from the article.
I’m blocked from the link and archive.org appears to be down at the moment.
Is this blocking police from touching the data regardless of where it came from, or would it still be okay for the police to request it from a fusion center? Fusion centers are one of the biggest workarounds on police regulations in the US.
The game that changed everything, at least to my memory. It kicked off a new and exciting era in gaming. It gave us CS, DoD, and who could forget playing as Barney the security guy in Blue Shift. A landmark title imo.
I hope you can get to both of them soon… especially EB.
Mother 2 is the best game of all time and if you disagree, Ness’ bat would like to have a word with you. Paula will pray for whatever is left of your soul when he is done.
Nintendo digitally re-released the original strategy guide awhile back, but I think my copy is faulty because I can’t smell the scratch and sniffs…
I’m really hoping an expert on Bratsk politics shows up to the thread to let us know lol
The taiga has been burning for years due to climate change. Some of these fires are nonstop, with so-called ghost fires burning underground through the winter that reignite into bigger fires when it gets dry. Siberia has had it the worst. I wonder if this is related. I would think it probably is.
It is noteworthy that the mayor of Bratsk (Irkutsk region) has already stated that “in all cases, fires are handmade, everywhere the human factor.” In all likelihood, the season of kebabs with alcohol in nature gave a new impetus to the elements. In some settlements, the fire was close to multi-storey buildings.
This could be a possibility too, although I don’t know whether the statement is in earnest or coming from a climate-denial perspective like you hear in the US and Canada. Hopefully the former. Is anyone familiar with the mayor, by any chance?
I think they can probably be held liable if damages can be proven and litigation is initiated through the US court system, but that is a big undertaking.
YouTube has some algorithms set up to remove content that it believes is highly likely to lead to trouble for itself. They are legally compelled to not host certain types of content, but most removed content is not in this category and is instead removed for business/political/optics reasons. The algorithms are primed for moderating western content because that is where YouTube expects these legal/political risks to come from.
In other words it is a very leaky net and there is no serious desire to make it airtight because it’s not a matter of mandatory regulation, it’s a matter of risk management. (If it were regulatory then the platform wouldn’t realistically be able to exist in the form that it does.)
Because other countries can’t respond appropriately unless they are aware. China would rather not be attacked, than wait to be attacked to reveal its capabilities.
I think adoption is king. The best solutions often fail when it comes to adoption, though. And starting a new solution when one is already adopted is not at all easy.
I understand that this author is working at a much lower level than the gamers and other casual users, so they will be much more likely to have to deal with the repercussions of poor design choices and edge-case bugs and missing functionality. But if they can make things work well enough when they are paid to do so, then adoption will continue. (On the other hand, they will also be the among the first to hit any showstopper issues if they do exist.)
I don’t think this kind of community is the best place for discussing nitpicky technical details because to most of us it is effectively whining about issues we will never have to deal with. (Nor is it a bad place, per se.) I think the comment would find a better home being digested by the technical experts who work on display solutions and other interoperating pieces of the larger environment. They are in a good position to weigh the criticism’s merits, and if any concerns are highly merited then they are the ones who would decide whether and how to design and and implement improvements.
deleted by creator
My mindset heavily affects how I handle things. The most direct link I think I have observed is how heavy my cognitive load is. Sometimes I have to intentionally pull myself out of my behaviors and make time and space for my cognitive bandwidth to improve.
Depression, in particular, imparts a heavy cognitive load. When I know I’m in a bad place, I do what I can to avoid unnecessary interactions so I can deal with it myself instead of taking the struggle out on others.
I agree it was a sober statement, but a narrow response. I like what Hondel said:
but obviously, the impact that it has on our lives and the reality we live in is significant.
And I was curious of Linus would comment at a more meta-level as well.
I just threw together a portfolio Flask app (infinitely simpler than doing kernel work, of course) that was 2000-3000 lines of connecting APIs and processing data. An AI wrote basically all of the code. 95% of it was scripts that I absolutely could have written myself with my usual references, and the other 5% I would have eventually found explained on StackExchange. (I still managed to learn from the code, thankfully, because I was still proof-reading and continually debugging it.) I knew what I wanted the app to do and how I wanted it to be done, and the AI gave me more-or-less functional code for each mechanism. It saved me hours of tinkering with CSS and other front-end tinkering that I loathe. It does take time to get the AI on the same page with your design - and to maintain its focus - but I can see myself becoming significantly more productive through these tools. I’m no expert, but neither is most of the workforce (although kernel work is, again, much more in the expert realm).
Afaik any sort of predictive and prototyping features have led to notable productivity gains. If this is predictive text on steroids, which I do not inherently disagree with, then we’re still talking about some pretty crazy steroids. What happens when even kernel work gets done in 10% of the time it normally would have taken? Is a surplus of labor maintained, and if so where does the newly-freed effort get utilized? We’re getting closer to the passing of the torch, and this technology could have profound organization consequences. But maybe it is too early to speak confidently on these matters. The resource consumption of AI and its growth isn’t particularly sustainable, after all.
deleted by creator
I swear this site is full of people that get off knowing they’re making someone else feel bad.
Says the person trying to make us feel bad for discussing news that affects us lol
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
The good: An even more addictive Harvest Moon!
The bad: Normal Harvest Moon was already addictive enough, so I skipped this one.