dream_weasel

Joke’s on you guys, I keep a red hot iron poker in my kitchen forge at all times. Just quench and cuppa.

Idk, install arch, then pull make files and dot files from git, wham bam, done how I like it on no time flat.

It doesn’t necessarily mean getting pushed further out.

It can always get worse.

Does drowning have any chance of ever getting you back?

It’s the style, or more specifically what it is turning into. Seems like when I got my first tastes of hip hop in the 90s it was more… musical / music forward? and now it kinda feels like just another rap flavor.

Same with greatest rapper and greatest country singer of all time: I would be inclined to steer clear since it’s just generally not my thing.

I don’t know how to help you, but I’ll tell you that I have the opposite perspective. The two artists I’d most like to avoid are the ones you mentioned, so if there was a way I could eliminate suggestions from anyone who was like “fuck yeah Kendrick and Drake” I would absolutely do that.

Taste over time is totally divergent and you’ve probably got your work cut out for you to find your exact niche :).

It’s like you’re stuck in the water with a riptide pushing you away from shore. A really strong swimmer would just swim against it, but you’re not, so you swim parallel to shore because then later you can swim back in. At least it’s not pushing you further out.

Nope.

Just decide to quit and drown. This is what the young “I’ll show you by not participating” crowd sounds like to me.

If the question is why do people hate XXX, doesn’t it matter who is the first to critique? It seems to me that if you provide an unprovoked critique, unless the subject of the critique agrees with your perspective they are likely to… dislike said critique or the person providing it, yeah?

Hence the relevance of who provided the first critique: right or not, people might not like it.

I would absolutely agree with you if there was only one surefire way to making earth uninhabitable, but luckily we’ve got several of those on the table at once.

As a thread reader here (not really contributor for this part) I see your point and I appreciate it, but I don’t know if it actually helps your case?

Basically you have established a moral high-ground and visceral reaction from the perspective of the non meat eating type and I can empathize with it, but doesn’t every group have this? Like if you said “Oh but it’s not just about birth control it’s about intentionally thwarting human life” as an argument for Catholics being against birth control… I can understand it but it isn’t an argument yeah? It’s an argument if I agree with your perspective, but otherwise I don’t think you’ve done anything different than the guy you replied to from a purely argumentative standpoint: you both gave a perspective and neither of you met in the middle.

From a debate perspective he’s got you by the short hairs because, even though he may not be absolutely right, you’ve made yourself look a little dickish to the rest of us.

What if I told you the quiet part loud? I don’t think every life is fundamentally created equal.

I’m a farm boy turned liberal and if you’re going to argue about climate change and the benefits of a vegetarian diet in that respect, you’ve got the right of it and I’ll eat less meat (I’m trying). If you’re going to say “cow abuse is child abuse!” I will personally come murder a cow for you and eat it with you (or against you, I guess?).

You are barking up the wrong tree and have missed the point whenever you come to this argument. Plants and animals grown for food ARE. FOR. FOOD. and you will not turn me to your way of thinking by crying foul about their treatment. I would love to minimize animal suffering / I am not into animal torture, but you’re just not going to get there unless you’re literally demonstrating widespread suffering for sport of livestock animals. If there was a raccoon outside right now screwing with my dog or my kid or my house or whatever I would absolutely end it and not lose a second of sleep, without considering it’s children or parentage or treatment.

I am who you are dealing with and who you are trying to convert. The “proper way to live” has nothing to do with it. I grow food, I eliminate pests, I eat the food I intended to raise. Cow, corn, pig, dog, cat, unicorn, etc: it gets to grow and flourish as much as I can provide, then it gets harvested to eat, unless it is invasive then it gets summarily removed.

It’s not about callousness or disregard for the beauty of life, my situation has just been fundamentally different than yours unless you also spent childhood raising your own food.

I mean, you are basically always in a group that is fucking the planet or society to some measure or another. Tell me about your religious choice, your political affiliation, your operating system/ phone / perspective on privacy, your opinion on nature vs nurture (or education vs indoctrination), and your perspective on micro- and macro-economic policy and I’ll be happy to tell you where and how you’re a giant irredeemable piece of shit.

And who, in your estimation, threw the first rock?

You forgot all the Montero and coin communities! It’s a good start though to be sure.

Np. We programmer types gotta help each other keep docs sharp ;)

Sheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.

9 women cannot have a baby in 1 month obviously, that’s an assembly problem.

What you need is 1 woman and 9 men.

Sounds good to me, gancho.

Sensor fusion is wicked hard though. At the sensor level and the track level it’s a huge pain, especially on something maneuverable.

And I guess the criteria for bot is “got downvotes” or “comments of disagreement” yeah?

Try truth social instead. Way fewer bots to bother you.