In an internal memo sent to the paper’s 5,800 employees, publisher A.G. Sulzberger said that while he had done everything in his power to keep The New York Times afloat, The Onion’s latest expansion into physical media had forced the company to reevaluate all parts of its business—from its glaringly inaccurate reporting, to its comparatively low circulation numbers, to its deeply unpopular brand, to its completely inept columnists.
I mean . . .
Woah. Elmo drove a Tesla??
“This terrible tragedy is because of the gays” - Pat Robertson
Also climate change is a hoax. - probably also Pat Robertson although at least that fucker’s already dead.
Me too - that was poorly worded.
It’s just one of many - MANY mechanisms the republiQans employ to maintain their iron grip on power.
They have “reasons” if you want them. They always do.
Couldn’t they just create an opensource instance and have some journalism majors run it? Or is that illegal there.
I said, “Get the hell outta here, you damn monstah!”
Hey, member when you always had to have IE for one of “those” sites and it was basically just an awful browser everyone was forced to have like as a legal requirement or something?
Heh. IE. Then when you’d use it to download firefox it’d say “Nooooo! Wait! I’m teh Best Browser!!” Hahahahah
IE. Ded.
Sweeeeeet.
Thank you!
Good news then. As a stupid American whenever I see some right-wing bullshit going down in NZ I think “AAAAaiiighhh! No! Not New Zealand!” and this article was a little to spot on for me to detect (until the end but still. Here the right-wing is so batshit insane anything’s possible).
This is a joke, right
“False claims”!! They’re not even talking about a single person! There’s zero chance they’ll be sued and they STILL can’t say “Lie”!
Pathetic!
The GQP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MAGA now
Indian, Macedonian - whatever it takes
I’ve been saying this for THIRTY YEARS
Well . . . there’s a . . . special . . uh, clause . . no, an . . uh . . “X factor” if you will. A “suprise element” to the law. An . . . extra layer, say, of jurisprudence in this case that the AG’s office of the very not-impeached-for-corruption Ken Paxton has elected to enforce, as they say in court filings, “with prejudice”.
Now, should there be . . . other? . . . Catholic priests who are - let’s say, hypothetically, just for the sake of argument here - who are perhaps under investigation for the same or worse crimes - well, now. That would all depend wouldn’t it. In Texas. Or, possibly Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky or . . .“Other”.
My Home Sweet Home!
Oh I was just agreeing! Thaat’s the same burn I came to post 😄