When I saw “Copilot Recall” I initially thought they recalled Copilot … one can dream

While that might be true, it doesn’t look like The Verge was sponsored by any specific ebike company to write this article, since they never mention any specific brand.

Edit: actually after scrolling down enough, they did interview people from some ebike company. Still doesn’t look (too) sponsored

Maybe I should’ve specified that it was unlocked via the official “OEM Unlock” switch provided by Samsung. Yes, there are Samsung phones that can be unlocked, though you’re right, many cannot be (usually US versions).

I’m writing this from a samsung with unlocked bootloader.

Google Maps, their traffic data has no rivals, unlike gmail which has plenty of good competition. It’s the one thing I couldn’t easily replace yet.

While she is of Jewish ancestry, she is not religiously observant.

and then

While welcoming the dialogue with Sheinbaum, members of the Jewish community do not consider her to be part of their ranks, in part because Sheinbaum herself has rejected any such connection. “Claudia has actively tried to say: ‘This is not me,” Schlosser said. “It must be respected when a person does not want to be identified in one way or another.”

… and more of that.

Seems like this article is more preoccupied with her religion, which she clearly states is not a big part of who she is, rather than her policies, which I’d be more interested in hearing about.

TL;DR: Your usual sensationalized headline.

The real numbers we need to see are watts per volume, or watts per mass

You have to chase it down, following the link to electrek.co, but then it says: “the prototype cells house an energy density of 720 Wh/kg”

(of course, I’m just stating what is claimed, no idea how true)

If you (or that website) want to spread this kind of alarmist information, some would say conspiracies, you’d better back it with credible sources for all the claims in there. I read it and saw exactly zero evidence.

Seems like we’d need both a way to block an instance posts only, and a way to block all posts, comments and users from an instance. Is it too much to ask? Did somebody open a feature request in github already (and has it been accepted or ignored)?

Yes, there are a lot of legitimate users for this AI technology, and writing a meaningful product listing title from (say) a longer product description, maybe in a different language, seems fine to me. Even using trademarked names could be ok, if the product sold has them (e.g. “mini pc with Intel ™ processor”).

The fact that they are generated and used without anybody even looking at them is highly suspicions, of course…

I just checked amazon and searching “OpenAI policy” or anything the like yields no results. I guess they got taken down?

One thing that’s sure to make things worse is to tell an angry person to “calm down”…

That’s because you’re on the internet, and nuance doesn’t exist. It requires thinking, which is hard.

Note: I don’t know JP and don’t have an opinion on him (yet). I’m responding only to the question in the title.

GPT4 is pulling these numbers out of its … I mean, out of thin air ;)

phew… the human race is safe (for now) 😅

The probability of getting both right the first time is easy: 0.25*0.25 = 0.625 or 6.25%

The probability of getting exactly one right is: either you get the 1st one right and miss the second, or vice versa. Thats 0.25*0.75 + 0.75*0.25 = 0.5*0.75 = 0.375 or 37.5%, so the probability of getting at least 50% is 0.375 + 0.0625 = 0.4375 or 43.75%, even without retries, so pretty good odds. The probability of missing both is 1 - 0.4375 = 0.5625 (or 0.75*0.75).

When you retry, there’s two possibilities:

1. You missed both: now your probability of getting at least one of them right is: (1/3)(1/3) + 2*(1/3)(2/3) =~ 55.55%
2. You got only one wrong: you just need to guess the other, so it’s 100% for you to get at least one, and 1/3 (33.33%) to get both

So, including a retry, you either:

1. Guess them both the first try: 0.0625 or 6.25%
2. Guess one of them, then guess both: 0.375*(1/3) = 0.125
3. Guess one of them, then still guess only one: 0.375*(2/3) = 0.25 or 25%
4. Guess none first, then guess one: 0.5625*2*(1/3)(2/3) = 0.25 or 25%
5. Guess none first, then guess both: 0.5625*(1/3)*(1/3) = 0.0625 or 6.25%
6. Guess none, then still guess none: 0.5625*(2/3)*(2/3) = 0.25 or 25%

So, probability of a passing grade is 75%. Not a very good test if it’s so easy to pass by random guessing ;)

deleted by creator

Will Chromium-based browsers also have this “feature”, or can they turn it off (and will they)? Or is firefox the only safe alternative left?

But laws respecting speech are not nearly as liberal.

Then I’m not sure if it would be their best bet … Wikipedia relies on free speech on many levels.

deleted by creator