I don’t know if it’s really assuming anything to say it isn’t. The negative position seems more neutral to me.
I don’t know if it’s really assuming anything to say it isn’t. The negative position seems more neutral to me.
Assuming it isn’t is the default position of agnosticism.
lol that was my thought too.
She was underage at the time.
What does this mean for apps like signal?
Suits are idiots. No argument there.
Ux is not about drawing pictures. That work is already automated by ui kits anyway. Ux is about thinking through requirements and research.
Brockman was also taken off the board so this seems unlikely.
yes, in fact it is. But it’s part of my religion.
Agreed
And your ancestors also subsistence farmed and didn’t have all the technology you do.
Look I’m as big a critics of our modern capital-industrial system as the next person but it’s crazy to not see how technology has made people more productive and given us more wealth.
Also the idea that peasants had lore days off is sorts debunked: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/kks6tq/comment/gh4oh5c
It is however quite true that people during the industrial revolution itself were working way more hours than previously which is why the whole labor movement kicked off. We appreciate the gains of previous ancestors fighting for our labor rights.
Could things be better? Certainly. Is automation being maliciously targeted towards art and creativity at the expense of not increasing productivity and reducing drudgery? No.
The key question to ask when some exclaims in favor of free markets is always “free for who?”.
Free for who?
When I say a sandwich is free, who is it free for? There’s no such thing as a free sandwich. Someone bears the cost.
Except in fact we have just seen 2 centuries of drudgery automated. Have you seen a combine harvester?
Fair. The only thing I’m trying to do here is fight the unnecessary reification of words.
Also worth noting that Marx never refers to two stages transition between capitalism and communism. He does refer to higher and lower stages of communism but those don’t map to lenin’s usage with socialism etc.
I recommend you actually watch the video.
You very clearly didn’t watch the video. Your interpretation of the critique of the Gotha program is off by a mile.
Technological progress is not generalizable in the abstract. For hundreds of years human built faster and faster means of transportation and yet the record for fastest human vehicle remains 1969 appollo 10 mission.
There are hard limits to physics. It is not malleable without limit.
Magic leap said they were going to shrink down their light field tech a decade ago but gave up. The reality is that this technology may just not be physically possible.
It’s really more of a spectrum.
Also words are literally determined by use. Arguing about then as if they have inherent meaning is stupid.
That would be true for the guy who said “the cops said it wasn’t anti semitic” but that was in a different thread from ours.