![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Gaza is not Israeli airspace.
Gaza is not Israeli airspace.
Don’t take down your Christmas lights (inside at least). Make hot chocolate at home, create rituals for yourself
This article sounds extremely fishy and borderline conspiracy-like to me.
Imho the only guarantee of privacy I need is the source code.
Yes, but if you intend to mainly use flatpak you might want to try fedora Silverblue
No, you can’t : in an immutable distro I can reasonably trace almost any file in the filesystem back to the package that created it, and know with a reasonable degree of certainty that the installed version of said file has not been tampered with. That isn’t possible an a normal distro.
Please do share with me what I do not understand.
A mostly read only filesystem built from a limited number of packages, with other files being in a fixed number of locations mean it is harder for malware to hide.
Very good choice :D
I used to daily drive arch, until university, when I got frustrated at the issues it caused me and the time I needed to solve them.
I’d recommend fedora if you want real solid stability.
I don’t think the DE itself matters, but I can recommend using an immutable OS (makes it harder to install malware) and installing flatpak apps only. You can also use software like flatseal to further lock down permissions
There is so much wrong with this post. Half of the points raised are utter bullshit
Dell’s current lineup is not to expensive (≈400) and runs Linux well
We have to wait and see for eIDAS, let’s hope with the changes to eIDAS dead, we’ll have at least a few years of the Commission not proposing some dumb surveillance shit
except an apartment costs money and so there are barriers to entry, lemmy accounts are free.
The only good analogy is “if you want to be friends with us, stop being friends with assholes”.
The latest text has not yet been released, but when it is you will see a separation between Identification and Encryption. It is also clearly stated that browsers are allowed to do whatever they want regarding recognition of CAs for encryption. tl;dr the status quo for encryption (linking a domain to a server) does not change, browsers will only be forced to recognise identity (linking a organisation to a server). This will force a re-engineering of QWACs/EV certs in general in favour of something like ntqwacs.
So jarring that you couldn’t just… Press no?
Just a heads up: new wording has killed this.
Parliament’s position on the proposed law will now be against chat control, but the fight is not over: next we have to negotiate with member states. It’s vital we keep the pressure on governments to end this madness.
No it isn’t. If you want to hear them feel free to create an account on an instance that doesn’t block them, that is how the fediverse and the real world works.
They are only isolated from those who don’t want to hear them.
It’s not a new law. The GDPR has been around for years, but meta only recently lost a legal case saying that they cannot contractually force users to provide their data in exchange for access to the service.
But the GDPR also says consent has to be freely given, some interpet this as meaning that forcing people to pay in order for their data not to be used for ads is not freely given consent.
But to shoot down other counties aircraft over Gaza would be to make the political statement that it is their airspace, which Is unacceptable