Veritasium. Over time I realized his content is mostly about flashy half baked “sciencey” content like Discovery Channel. It’s meant to get an audience and nothing more. It lacks quality control, and fact checking. I only realized how many errors his videos have when he covered a topic I know more about. Also, the whole electricity thing and self driving car debacle only reinforced my views on his content.
Obviously a stunt.
The video fails to explain what about this is “AI” as opposed to active noise cancelling with some regular old signal processing.
The article didn’t bother to link the paper. Also odd way to put it to say it “increases signature”. Like, have they found a way to throw radar reflecting goo on the F-22?
No, this is essentially about networked radars. Which would be interesting if they bothered to discuss the tech. I suppose I’ll wait for Sandboxx News to cover it.
Downvoting for misleading title. There is no “millions of gallons” leaked. Amount is currently unknown. “Could have” wording is an excuse for the headline.
Ironically, I didn’t read this. But, I think the premise is dubious in that text is only a medium. Hell, text itself can range from tabloid articles to research papers.
How is “reading” any different from “watching”, or “listening”? It’s all about quality of the material, not how to consume the media.
This actually does keep prices in check. Albeit, a bit backasswardsly.
I may be off on the specifics but it’s something like: Having to offer 100mbps at the lowest rates in (poor neighborhoods) increases the speeds of each tier while keeping the price the same.
What kind of “tip” is paid upfront before the service is rendered?
@RemindMe@programming.dev remind me in 6 months
I wish there was RemindMe bot on Lemmy
Let’s leave accurate military reporting to outlets specializing on military and aviation.
deleted by creator