Old habits die hard, that’s the first alias on my list in .zshrc!
Old habits die hard, that’s the first alias on my list in .zshrc!
Like how OOP was the best thing ever for everything, and just now 30 years later is proven to be actually bad.
Alan Kay coined the term 57 years ago and we have to look at the landscape back then to see just how much OOP has actually influenced pretty much all languages, including ones that distance themselves from the term now. Avoiding shared global state. Check. Encapsulating data and providing interfaces instead of always direct access. Check. Sending signals to objects/services for returned info. Check check check.
Windows shared libs could do with having an rpath
equivalent for the host app. I tried to get their manifest doohickeys working for relative locations but gave up and still just splat install them in the exe directory.
Aside from that shared libraries are great. Can selectively load/reload functions from them at runtime which is a fundamental building block of a lot of applications that have things like plugin systems or wrappers for different hardware etc. Good for easier LGPL compliance as well.
I’d never heard of that, thanks for the link!
brainfuck is a member of an exclusive club of languages where it’s much easier to write a compiler for it than to read a program written in it.
I use Manjaro (kindof btw) with the Gnome desktop and didn’t know there were that many. Not all are installed by default here anyway.
I’m too cynical. I hope to once again share some faith in the system again. All the best!
It’s the section “Access to electronic evidence” and the talk of encryption there, with delegates pressing “lawful access by design”. They aren’t dreaming of lawful access to encrypted byte streams and when there’s a backdoor for lawful access today, it’s available for different laws tomorrow. They do seem like they are on the same page on this, which isn’t surprising since it was floated onto the G7 agenda from wherever globalist policy originates from.
It looks like the US is still gunning for it, which is expected with top-down globalist policy. Yes, I’m in the UK where the last few leaders haven’t been elected by the people. All perfectly normal stuff.
Unfortunately the mission to regain control of information flow is a top-down policy and the UK government is just swimming in the direction everybody is being steered to. There are several countries all implementing their own versions of this, for example India recently banning some e2ee apps. Also the EU has approved a law which requires that companies be able to scan content of user messages.
I don’t know any specifics about the laws being considered in North America, or what’s happening in South America, Africa or the rest of Asia at all, but I’d imagine any banned list would be pretty long by the time the dust settles. In the meantime it’ll be more than a little cringe worthy watching the politicians in different countries trying to take credit for the trickle down policies they sell.
Perhaps a technical solution could be apps with backdoored encryption exposing an interface for other apps to pass and receive encrypted messages. Dividing themselves in two even. A custom text editor isn’t a messaging app.
The developers aren’t trustworthy on the account of their extremist ideology…
What do you mean by that? Are they hell bent on using Rust Nightly and making overly-judicious use of .unwrap()
?
edit: I see that you mean they are Marxist-adjacent.
Hopefully Mojo will sort it all out. Maybe even inspiring a new, positive streak of xkcd strips in the future?
Are there precisely 37 developers in that team??