I can’t read fsck
as anything other than “fs check”
Verse ancap Brazilian doomer
I can’t read fsck
as anything other than “fs check”
What’s the deal? I’m OOTL
If it’s being used to give the definite answer of a search, so it should. If it can, than it shouldn’t be used for that
Protestants, maybe. Protestantism is a wide group, some against birth control (like Adventists), some don’t
Birth control was always prohibited im Christianity (at least Catholics, the ones I know the most about), from condom to pills to IUD, this won’t change it.
Any christian that is against one kind of birth control but in ok with other is just freestyling dogmas
Like any other holiday ever.
In Brazil we have Dia dos Namorados (Lovers’ Day) on June 12 instead of Valentine’s Day on February 14 because of a marketing campaign to sell gifts in part of the year that sales were weak. The idea was to create a holiday where lovers would exchange gifts. “You can’t prove love just by kissing!” said their slogan
But I already knew this
I certainly wasn’t bragging about being circumcised
Actually when you are circumcised you can feel that you are going to come, I mean I know for sure because I am. But it’s still a lot of fun xD
If you already knew, you weren’t bragging, and it was not satire, then what did it supposed to mean?
You actually don’t seem to know (which surprised me), so I will tell you. I’m from Brazil, almost nobody here is circumcised. I can say for sure, everybody, circumcised or not, can feel they’re about to cum, that has nothing to do with having or not foreskin.
There are people who report that being circumcised makes you a bit less sensitive so you last longer. I cannot confirm or deny that, although it makes sense. But feeling your about to cum is not an ability you unlock for being circumcised.
You said in the edit that you don’t understand why you got so much push back. You got it because your comment is very confident in an absolutely wrong fact, that shows a very strong lack of understanding of other people
Is this satire?
Kernel level anti-cheat should be a crime
I’m not yet convinced that “violating the unix philosophy” is a bad thing. I’m not saying that it’s not, I don’t have a defined opinion about this yet
LMs aren’t thinking, aren’t inventing, they are predicting what is supposed to be answered next, so it’s expected that they will produce the same results every time
This is nice. I’ve played a lot of TR2 in my childhood (it was my dad’s, it was already old when I used to play) and I was very bad at it
I didn’t like the textures a lot tho. It lost a bit of its charm
I don’t need to adhere to the FOSS philosophy in the extreme to be allowed to use Linux
I guess Firefox market share will be closely related to Linux desktop market share
I love these, it has actual useful keys
Don’t do your own research, just believe in the Current Thing™. Just trust the Scientists™, they are smarter than you.
“I an Lithuanian”