There is some difference I see in the management layer, with more dynamic resource allocation in a cloud infrastructure compared to traditional data center usage.

Exactly what I expected from them. The same interests that want chat control are here as well.

deleted by creator

Porteus kiosk thin client might be an option.

deleted by creator

There could be a middlegreound if revolt implemented a central openid user registry, presence indication and e2ee direct chat plus self hosted communities using that login (and maybe optional local registration). And maybe a community overview for public communities.

That depends on the depth of the review, e.g. verifying the submitter is a member of the project, the software name does not conflict with a well known name,…

At least this prevents impersonation of well-known publishers or their software. Maybe all changes to metadata like the description should require a manual review even for established packages.

deleted by creator

Apple will respond with something something RCS coming soon I guess.

No need for a systemd switch. It should work with a dedicated “portal” browser that bypasses the global dns and has a built-in resolver using the dns from dhcp.

There is also an alternative push protocol called UnifiedPush, but not many of the popular privacy focused messengers care to implement it.

Depending on the servers and clients that is no longer true. https://ircv3.net/