• 0 Posts
  • 100 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle





  • qevlarr@lemmy.worldtoNews@lemmy.world[META] MBFC bot
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You think that’s all legit? I don’t see permaban levels of rule breaking at all there. More admin and moderator boneheadedness causing mild irritation with users. You’re asking for feedback, then ignore most of that feedback, and now ban disagreement because they’re understandably frustrated with your responses.




  • These people were specifically trying to get the bot removed? Must have hit quite a nerve. I know it was biased in favor of Israel, but it must have been even worse. That bot sucks so bad people make mass sockpuppet accounts just to tell you they want it gone



  • This is a bit learning the wrong lesson from what happened, isn’t it? The problem is admin overreach. There was some disagreement on a sub, no big deal. I don’t even care what it’s about, I have no opinion on it. But now this admin comes in like Eric Cartman “Respect mah authoritah!”. What am I supposed to make of that? Nobody was advocating animal abuse. I worry about admins who can’t just let something go, who can’t handle disagreement, like a cop always looking to escalate.

    So thanks for the rules clarification, I guess, but what about:

    • won’t this general guideline of ‘do no harm’ stifle discussion in case it isn’t clear which is the harmful position? For example covid
    • is there a process in place when an admin does something in the heat of the moment, that the admin team can let them cool off for a bit?
    • is removing mods going to be the norm?
    • will there be more rules when another admin disagrees with a mod?
    • why was this escalated like this? Don’t you think removing mod status is an overreaction (procedure wise)?
    • does the ‘anti animal abuse’ statute apply to animal consumption and animal products? Vegan community has a point there
    • what about rooki?

    All in all, please don’t kill this instance by telling people what to think. There is healthy discussion and people don’t always have to agree. That doesn’t make me a ‘free speech absolutist’. I think removing moderator privileges was quite out of bounds. Again, nobody was advocating animal abuse at all.

    Mods and admins are here to keep discussion healthy, not impose their views on everyone else, right? So don’t! And don’t cover for others who do!