Mr. Grimm pleaded guilty in exchange for an agreement that prosecutors would not seek the death penalty. But under Virginia law at the time, the crime was not eligible for capital punishment.

Where was this dude’s lawyer?

Ah OK, I can’t read apparently. I thought you meant the attacks from Iraqi militias have been going on longer than the current Israeli invasion. I agree with your original comment.

For these particular groups the article says the exact opposite.

But on Nov. 2 they claimed their first ever attack on Israel.

In general it is pretty rare for anyone to directly attack Israel other than groups they created through their various occupations, mainly Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad.

Yep. And the subheading I really have a problem with.

Reading too much into the language seems, at this point, to be less of a danger than reading too little into it.

The implication being that it’s low stakes to make this accusation without solid evidence. In reality the whole justification from the West for the state of affairs between Israel and Palestine is that Arabs are a bunch of backwards savages, and this extends to the way the West has acted throughout the Middle East.

I don’t think you understand. There were two buildings, the embassy and the consulate. The embassy was not directly hit, the consulate was.

https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-04-01/syria-says-deadly-israeli-airstrike-destroyed-irans-consular-building-in-damascus

While Iran’s consular building was leveled in the attack, according to Syria’s state news agency, its main embassy building remained intact. Still, the Iranian ambassador’s residence was inside the consular building.

Also looks like the Vienna Convention defines diplomatic missions not the Geneva Convention. My bad.

It was a consulate which is also covered by the Geneva convention as all diplomatic missions are. There really isn’t a significant distinction here.

Not that it’s anything new, but it’s crazy that 2 ICBM-armed states have a massive border standoff.

https://apnews.com/article/iran-iraq-militant-bases-attack-05c7530d66fb05dd6f2868527003ba2d

AP article is a bit more detailed here. Looks like the militia is not affiliated with the Pakistani military which lowers the stakes of this fortunately.

People like to thumb their noses at comments like this, but the Saudis bombed the Houthis for the better part of a decade and that still couldn’t stop them from taking potshots at Saudi oil infrastructure. Note that the Saudis were using US weapons and intelligence to attack the Houthis so not totally different from the current situation. In the end diplomacy was what got the Houthis to stop. I’m skeptical that this time is going to be significantly different.

ETA: by comments I mean the comments of the Qatari PM.

https://www.businessinsider.com/neri-oxman-plagiarize-wikipedia-mit-dissertation-2024-1?op=1

The original story they’re referring to.

Looks like IDF is claiming 170 child soldiers with no evidence of direct involvement in fighting. Seems to be a war crime on Hamas’s part, but pinning mass death of children on child soldiers is not honest. Not saying you specifically are pushing this idea, but thought some context wouldn’t hurt here.

Trump tried judicial and legislative coups. A military coup has gotta be the next logical step were he to get back in power. There’s evidence he looked to this possibility while still in office. While there are safeguards here, like appointments having to pass through congress, this will be the most important thing to focus on if he gets back in office. If Trump starts getting his goons into military leadership, it’s go time for mass protests and civil disobedience before it’s too late.