not() is a base function that negates what’s inside (turning True to False and vice versa) giving it no parameter returns “True” (because no parameter counts as False)

Actually, not is an operator. It makes more sense if you write not() as not () - the () is an empty tuple. An empty tuple is falsy in Python, so not () evaluates to True.

It’s a joke.

I don’t think a community for it is an unreasonable idea - at least for now, many AI images are easily identifiable by defects / lack of reasoning in the image. Though there isn’t a good computer program that can do this, I agree.

It says “hot surface do not touch” in full, actually. Braille uses single characters to represent some common letter combinations (“touch” is “t” + “ou” + “ch”). The words “do” and “not” are each contracted to a single letter (“d” and “n” respectively).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Braille#Contractions

Birds have peckers

Blue Marlin is a semi-submersible ship, which means that it can lower itself partly underwater to allow its cargo to move on/off. The ship is designed primarily to move oil rigs around, with this being a special case. The radar itself is actually a converted oil rig.

Blue Marlin preparing to offload an oil rig:

Yeah, the average iPhone user probably doesn’t use Files at all. Photos stores all of your photos and videos, so it’s really just PDFs that go in there for me. And a lot people don’t ever download PDFs anyways, since you can view them directly in a browser.

Not for babies, it won’t

The headline uses the word “demagogue” to describe Trump. “Demagogue” is defined as:

A political leader who seeks support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people rather than by using rational argument.

I think OC is arguing that the article hints that Trump’s campaign is devoid of rational argument by using this word, which would imply that they aren’t exactly on Trump’s side. I’m not personally familiar with the Guardian’s political standpoint, though.

Remember r/WtWFotMJaJtRAtCaB

(When the Water Flows over the Milk Jug at Just the Right Angle to Create a Bubble)

³LMAO

Not sure; I’ve wondered that before too. If I had to guess I’d say people just keep naming future kings after previously liked kings - the first few king Louis weren’t all that popular, but later on there were some popular ones (Louis IX was named a saint, for instance, which may have boosted it).

16 is certainly a lot of kings to have the same name. I believe there’s 20-something Pope Johns, if I recall correctly

They just don’t want you to see the tongues licking the dishes

I don’t see why you’re being downvoted - whilst a significant portion of Apple’s claimed ‘carbon neutrality’ can indeed be attributed to carbon offsets, they have also made changes in other areas. Here’s a graph from Apple’s climate report that shows the supposed change in emissions between last year and this year’s watches.

Source

You mean 2 -> 4?

2^2 = 4

I made a beef stroganoff meme a couple days ago, and it seems it’s become beans mk2 lol

https://sh.itjust.works/post/5513795

I posted a meme about it yesterday, and I guess it’s just beans mk2 now 🤷‍♂️

https://sh.itjust.works/post/5513795

Started here https://sh.itjust.works/post/5513795

I’ve had this image in my camera roll for ages, so I’m not sure. IIRC it came from an r/dalle post, but I could be wrong