![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Ok I’ll delete it. Thanks Google.
Ok I’ll delete it. Thanks Google.
Go look up the definition of stupid and pretend that’s what I said about your argument. No need for semantics or nuance just take it at face value I’m sure it’s accurate enough as is
I assure you, the word “no” does not have any other meanings.
Like your choosing to define a word differently than someone else?
No? I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you know English, and interpreting them as written. There’s not a whole lot of room for interpretation there.
Though I am starting to wonder if maybe I gave you too much credit
Saying two conflicting things in the same statement isn’t semantics. It’s evidence that the author is a putz.
“there was no reason, but here’s the reason” isn’t semantics. It’s just you contradicting yourself one sentence later.
Greco-Roman paganism didn’t treat women as owned property of men like the Abrahamic faiths do
Yes they fucking did lmao. Greek women had absolutely no rights
I don’t. Instincts are a reason. If it was following its instincts, it didn’t attack for no reason.
Updates are paused until 2038/January/19
And the botnets rejoiced for their bounty was plentiful
That actually sounds awesome sign me up
Well, let’s see. We have a century’s worth of uranium left, and only 50 years of petroleum. Also, resource scarcity isn’t really the problem with petrochemicals. It’s the environmental impact. Nuclear doesn’t have that problem. Classic brainwashed tree hugger poser rambling on incoherently while ignoring any and all inconvenient facts. You should join Greenpeace.
Another significant reason we didn’t invest more in nuclear was hysteria spread by fear mongering groups like Greenpeace.
But sure, it’s Greenpeace’s fault and not Exxon Mobil.
They’re both to blame. They both put significant money and effort into keeping us on petroleum long after a viable alternative was available.
FDR threw Japanese Americans in concentration camps. He didn’t oppose fascism, he just didn’t think Hitler was doing it right.
If we had gone nuclear 60 years ago climate change would be nothing more than an interesting theory. Greenpeace has as much share of the blame for the current state of the world as Exxon mobil does.
Repoint your DNS, send everything to legal, delete Facebook hit the gym
That tracks for Greenpeace. They’ve been fighting nuclear power since their inception.
So why wasn’t it addressed during the Obama admin, when Democrats controlled both houses of Congress?
it is unlikely that Linux Desktop adoption will ever proliferate to the kinds of mainstream adoption that its accolades desire.
And if it does, the acolytes will hate it and start pushing for BSD adoption, because there’s a huge streak of hipsterism in the Linux community
That’s been true every year since I stated paying attention. In 1997.
You have to disable auto reboot on bsod