If two parties are at odds with one another, and one on them is willing to use violence and the other isn’t, the violent party wins.

Is that a Martin Luther King quote?

Posting on 4chan

Maybe wait until November before you make a decision

He learned not to listen to cops

Elitism and gatekeeping from a linux user? Nah, never, I must have misread

And iOS, making Unix one of the largest operating systems on the planet

“a fifteen hundred” maybe

Who over the age of 6 counts on their fingers

I do not use pronouns, and I don’t think you or they should use them either.

Make every American a member of the supreme Court and cases are decided by a popular vote

Believe it or not they teach that at Harvard business school (it’s an elective but it still counts)

You have to disable auto reboot on bsod

Ok I’ll delete it. Thanks Google.

Go look up the definition of stupid and pretend that’s what I said about your argument. No need for semantics or nuance just take it at face value I’m sure it’s accurate enough as is

I assure you, the word “no” does not have any other meanings.

Like your choosing to define a word differently than someone else?

No? I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you know English, and interpreting them as written. There’s not a whole lot of room for interpretation there.

Though I am starting to wonder if maybe I gave you too much credit

Saying two conflicting things in the same statement isn’t semantics. It’s evidence that the author is a putz.

“there was no reason, but here’s the reason” isn’t semantics. It’s just you contradicting yourself one sentence later.

Greco-Roman paganism didn’t treat women as owned property of men like the Abrahamic faiths do

Yes they fucking did lmao. Greek women had absolutely no rights

I don’t. Instincts are a reason. If it was following its instincts, it didn’t attack for no reason.