I get this position, truly, but I struggle to reconcile it with the feeling that artwork of something and photos of it aren’t equal. In a binary way they are, but with more precision they’re pretty far apart. But I’m not arguing against it, I’m just not super clear how I feel about it yet.
Like with everything, context matters. Sometimes it can indicate poorly structured control flow, other times inefficient loop nesting. But many times it is just somebody’s preference for guard clauses. As long as the intent is clear, there are no efficiency problems, and it is possible to reach the fewest branches necessary, I see no issues.
I reread all the comments. Please link to the specific one.
Why do you assume that? Why would it not make sense to mean Mexican food when saying Mexican food.
Close to 40 million Hispanics of Mexican descent live in the USA. You don’t think there is good Mexican cuisine there? Because in my experience, anywhere I find Mexicans, I find some damned good vittles.
“Get well” is completely different than the other two. It is rarely if ever used as an imperative. It is more like “(I hope you) get well”. Well wishes are good.
Fuck Boeing, but your comment was still a nonsense hammer in search of a nail, and what you said would come never came.
Probably, but I can’t help but feel you are what you accuse here, leveling an accusation at a target which doesn’t exist yet.
I read this whole comment thread but somehow missed that one? What prompted this?
I’m not completely convinced. It is possible but sounds a bit high to me. It is based on a survey of less than 3k parents, and although I found the BBC article, it doesn’t seem to link to the actual source. It is therefore difficult to take this too seriously without seeing exactly who was interviewed and how the questions were worded.
It runs in browsers. It… isn’t poop? I don’t know. I’m all out of ideas.
I’ve seen this before but don’t accept it myself. There are cases where you just wanted to cat. In this case, maybe to review the problem. Then you want to extend the command. Preserving it in the next commands where you start stacking on pipes is useful since it can be fewer strokes and maintain a habit.
Just remember, if you don’t vote for one geriatric corporatist, you’re basically voting for the other geriatric corporatist. So you better be a good little voter.
It does to the nearly 200 signatories of its charter.
Do you always have it in conjunction with coffee or eggs?
I had that same habit a few years back, but have not had that problem for some time. DDG seems to generally provide the results I seek.
That’s terrifying.
I have heard this point of view and truly don’t understand it. There were companies making money with an open source tool. That’s what some companies do, and the license allowed for that. They weren’t taking; they were using a tool, and providing a service upon it. If anybody is taking, it is Hashicorp from their own community that contributed thousands of hours to their business for free.
And those companies you refer to tried often to push upstream but Hashicorp just refused contribution time after time.
That said I understand it too. Insofar as capital investment demanded the cornering of a market and miscalculated the likelihood of a well backed fork. As a result I think, they probably sealed their fate even if it takes many years. How many people remember Hudson?
Backing the legislation forcing them to do just that isn’t entirely vapid. I mean, I’m not counting on them completely, but it is a step in the right direction.
And Saint Ignucious, RMS, of course.