I bet it was scalpers

Very big difference between social discrimination and medical treatement

Anyone know how the plugin developer responded?

Would be dope if the response was ‘Fuck you, prove it’

e. Well, the response was in the article, big disappointment “gotta take down the plugin”.

It’s haier’s responsibility to prove damages

With any luck, over time, we’ll learn proper city building infrastructure from the europeans and implement it locally. Florida will probably be several feet under the ocean at that point, but hopefully when everyone relocates to higher ground we’ll build half decent cities for them to live and work in.

Hopefully.

… hopefully.

Then you should work on your reading comprehension.

Don’t disagree with you but north american infrastructure is not set up for public transit

Air force denies actual casualty and claims it was ‘only a simulation’, still problematic, assuming it stopped at a simulation: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/01/us-military-drone-ai-killed-operator-simulated-test

The above AI is allegedly the core of what’s being used for these: https://www.wired.com/story/us-air-force-skyborg-vista-ai-fighter-jets/

You didn’t ask for it but these are the drones that pick their own targets: https://www.npr.org/2021/06/01/1002196245/a-u-n-report-suggests-libya-saw-the-first-battlefield-killing-by-an-autonomous-d

Is it really a choice if they fundamentally cannot afford to do so?

I mean he can have his opinion on this, I do personally agree, but it’s way too late to try and stop now.

We’ve already got automated drones picking targets and killing people in the middle east and last I heard the newest set of US jets has AI integrated so heavily that they can opt to kill their operator in order to perform objectives

Nothing like moving children into an objectively abusive system than helping their families get back on their feet.

No shit?

That’s why these companies need to be taxed heavier (and tax loopholes closed) in order to cover basic necessities and reeducation of the workforce using UBI.

Removed by mod

The least you could do is read the research links provided in both the articles and the references provided before pretending like I didn’t provide direct referential material to every point I made.

Removed by mod

1. Pretending abortion is in the same realm as AI tool abuse is ridiculous and completely dishonest.

.

2. Scare quotes? Are you for real? Since you don’t understand, quotes denote emphasis or specificity, not emotion. “Teen”, the emphasis here, was used because teens are barely educated in legal matters and it’s their responsibility to seek assistance, not push legislation.

.

3. If the adults in that area had actually responded properly, there wouldn’t be an article about a new bill against AI, instead there’d be an article about defamation and debasement of a minor (likely by another minor, but that doesn’t mean the other minors parents are infallible in this situation, you are either parents or you’re not, if you are, you’re responsible for your brats actions, if you’re not, then the state will take the child and destroy them mentally, and likely physically, for your failures as a parent).

.

4. Not a single thing I said dismissed this, and I would go even further to say anyone pursuing the AI angle is the one dismissing this, especially given the laws that already exist that can be used to assist and protect the teen in question.

.

5. We’ve had adobe premier for more than 2 decades before generative AI and all of the issues surrounding deepfakes then cover every issue with generative AI now and wasting peoples time and money on this does not help improve the situation, instead it makes a mockery of the victim for the purposes of pushing an agenda.

Assuming you’re being genuine and not rhetorically trying to present a ‘gotcha’, I’ll answer the question.

https://ilostat.ilo.org/these-occupations-are-dominated-by-women/ You’ll notice women have the advantage of being able to choose professions which don’t end their lives or break their bodies and minds prematurely.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201707/why-brilliant-girls-tend-favor-non-stem-careers

Here you’ll see an article (with corresponding associated research) that goes into the extreme biases surrounding this discussion, especially with individuals pretending to ‘know’ or ‘understand’ the core of the issue without engaging in the realities that there is a fundamental difference between the sexes. This doesn’t have anything to do with the individual and what the individual chooses to do, it has to do with the average and what the statistics say about that. Statistics cannot be applied to an individual and an individuals views and decisions cannot be applied to the statistics. (rather, should not since incompetent malcontents always will try)

The vast majority of ‘evidence’ that states that these issues in the choices women make are discriminatory or pay based are entirely corollary and not directly evidence based. (I.e. the subject matter is not directly evidenced, and only related data is used to infer a conclusion but not actually determine a conclusion based on clear evidence and research).

Females have the inherent ability to empathize and assist others and males inherently do not, on an average basis, not on an individual basis. (Men can be empathetic but not ALL men are able to be empathetic while most women can be empathetic not ALL women can be empathetic, as a direct example with evidence) https://www.acton.org/publications/transatlantic/2019/04/05/reason-women-dont-enter-stem-professions-revealed

Activists like to pretend it’s discrimination and sexism that prevents women from pursuing careers in STEM but the reality is, what few women actually want to get into STEM are the ones who suffer the discrimination therein, and that impacts THAT SPECIFIC group of women, not ALL women.

Again, this is an issue that comes down to small group data being used as an example of ‘why’ for the whole group without actually being the reason why, simply a useful point of data which people can abuse for their own agendas. The same thing assholes do when they have a negative reaction with someone of a different race and then they say “all X people are like this”.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/02/the-more-gender-equality-the-fewer-women-in-stem/553592/ https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/the-global-educational-gender-equality-paradox-the-more-gender-equality-in-a-country-the-fewer-women-in-stem/

Research:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797617741719?journalCode=pssa

https://phys.org/news/2015-01-explanation-gender-gaps-academia.html

https://sci-hub.se/10.1037/a0017364

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222673203_Sex_Differences_in_Human_Neonatal_Social_Perception

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583786/

https://www.aaas.org/news/journals-and-funders-confront-implicit-bias-peer-review

https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1240031/FULLTEXT01.pdf

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Gender_pay_gap_statistics

https://www.di.se/digital/bolag-grundade-av-kvinnor-far-1-procent-av-riskkapitalet/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02645505231221240

https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-023-01267-z

https://www.telenor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/The-Gender-Gap-in-Technology-in-Scandinavia_Full-report.pdf

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09636625211002375?icid=int.sj-abstract.similar-articles.2

Articles:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/countries-with-less-gender-equity-have-more-women-in-stem-huh/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201607/what-explains-some-demographic-gaps-simpsons-paradox

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201707/gender-bias-in-science-or-biased-claims-gender-bias

https://www.aaas.org/news/journals-and-funders-confront-implicit-bias-peer-review

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201707/why-brilliant-girls-tend-favor-non-stem-careers

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/02/the-more-gender-equality-the-fewer-women-in-stem/553592/

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/the-global-educational-gender-equality-paradox-the-more-gender-equality-in-a-country-the-fewer-women-in-stem/

Also, regarding “the patriarchy”, anyone making that claim these days when the military industrial complex is almost entirely run by women are wholly disingenuous and should be completely barred from the discussion until they educate themselves on the reality around them.

Per example:

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/02/how-women-took-over-the-military-industrial-complex-1049860

https://inthesetimes.com/article/women-military-industrial-complex-gina-haspel-trump-feminism-lockheed-marti

Thanks for not actually reading my comment and making it clear to everyone who did that you’re either illiterate or a dishonest asshole.

There are already laws against creating false content about people, so adding more laws isn’t going to make the previous laws more or less valid and it’s only going to waste time and money.

Of course it’s being pushed by a “teen” since this teen clearly doesn’t have any understanding of the issues at hand, the technology at hand nor the laws that already exist to help them with this issue.

It was up to the adults around this teen to help her navigate the issue and instead the incompetent pieces of worthless shit choose to push a new bill against AI rather than use the current legal framework that exists to actually help this girl.

Anything to abuse a child or teens situation for their political gain. Worthless trash.

Literally nothing, but morons will pretend otherwise in order to waste money and time because they can’t think of any other way to engage the problem.

Thank you for completely missing the point and being a direct example of the issues I was discussing.