It’s not twitter it’s Xitter!
Hint hint
Yup, same thing, but more shitty. Although, I agree with MAGA Musk that it shouldn’t fucking exist.
It’s not twitter it’s Xitter!
Yup, same thing, but more shitty. Although, I agree with MAGA Musk that it shouldn’t fucking exist.
Well, they are half-eaten on the back, so checks out.
Yes, yes it does. You xit xeets on the xitter.
I prefer xitter
OpenAI says it’s impossible to create useful AI models without copyrighted material
Good riddance, then just don’t.
What about privacy and bloat? Do you really need an integrated big-brother Clippy again? There’s a reason they got rid of that annoying little bugger 20-ish years ago. Even killed Cortana. How many failed experiments more do we need?
If you need AI writing, you have it in Edge or on the ChatGPT site. Will they add AI to settings to help you turn on all the bloat and tracking for you?
Like just give me my damn control panel which has a working search feature (unlike, say, Settings)
There might be a few, but you’re always free to change your career if you want. You’re very much not free to just leave peison.
Nothing against gamification, but when they added lives about two years after they said they never will I lost any and all trust I had in them.
When talking about Israelis killed, the BBC used the word “grandmother” 52 times, while it used it 32 times when describing Palestinians killed. Likewise, it used the word “murdered” 101 times for Israelis killed while only once when talking about Palestinians.
The rest of the rows are similar.
The intended takeaway is that Palestinian deaths are reported blandly, while Isrseli deaths are painted in a much more endearing light.
Granted, there are some considerations of possible biases towards the results. For example, maybe there were less articles about Palestinians and as such less opportunities to use the same word. Maybe there isn’t enough information flowing out of Gaza as opposed to Israel or BBC. There are also the more extreme options of the authors of the data trying to paint the BBC negatively and the BBC strategically painting Israeli deaths as more tragic and brutal than Palestinian desths.
Which option you take as the most plausible is your call tho.
deleted by creator
They are all webkit-based, but they can add their own integrations like Google account login for Chrome or Firefox Sync. So it would still be benificial to boycott if you reasonably can and are willing, especially with the recent App store developments Apple might even be forced to open up browsers as well.
Just try to look at the sky at night. Most places in the world you won’t see the stars and yet no one complains too much about the visual pollution
Psychologist should get publically shamed to hell and back. Even if Poland doesn’t have client confidentiality (and that’s a big if), she still has basic ethics of her profession to uphold. Hope the courts of Poland throw this one out.
At least it exists. Not a big win for sure, but a step in the right direction nonetheless.
What I don’t understand is him getting sacked. While he did name a few people and cut ties, I don’t see the people named couldn’t stand up with him after being named. It seems as if they really support the war crimes in Gaza.
What if the bank decides to keep all $1.000 and loan out $10.000? While money wasn’t printed, phantom money was most definitely conjured out of thin air. And with the magic I don’t see how a bank couldn’t have, say, bought Disney with the phantom dollars
deleted by creator
So they’re not charging anything?