I mean the three year ban seems like they didn’t forget.
I mean the three year ban seems like they didn’t forget.
Reliable, low maitenance, with good infastructure. 80 sounds like a solid number when not including game devs and support staff.
Don’t be fooled he’s only going to hack tractors.
Don’t be fooled he’s going out there to hsck tractors now.
That guy is just mad and petty, the comment I originally made was genuine since attempting to influence the other party is a part of politics and this didn’t seem news worthy.
Yeah? That’s how politics work these days. It happens both directions every election.
They’re scared of a file called “System 32.” Delete it and the little people should come back.
United Methodists have always been a very liberal and progressive church. This isn’t a gimmick or boost for the masses but bringing their teachings in line with their sayings.
It’ll work for about a week before the US destroys the other half of their navy.
Good, defying Xi is the most important thing the young generations can do.
I just hope they vote third party. No reason to support either candidate.
Why would you fund the prisoners viewing experience, prisons have a commisary let them buy them if they want the glasses. Other than that I hope grown adults can be trusted enough to not look directly at the sun but I have less faith in that every day.
Doesn’t make sense to lockdown the prison, but they shouldn’t be provided any of the equipment.
The US has sent around 14 billion dollars to Israel on top of the 3.8 we send every year. With Israel claiming 15,899 killed and Palestine claiming 22,835, we recieve a dollar to kill ratio of 1.1 million to 779k per palestinian. The US had a 10 million per Iraqi ratio after the conclusion of the Iraq war. Ukraine has recieve 46.3 billion dollars in military aid. With around 100k dead russians we are getting a kill every 463k per Russian ratio.
Did you see how the article did not bring up the country you mentioned? Let’s stay on topic and talk about the other two countries.
Mexican territory, Mexican issue, no need to endanger an American for someone still in Mexico. On your second point, you didn’t reread the news article. They weren’t IN America, they had not applied for asylum. They were breaking into the country. If they wanted to apply for asylum, they should have done so at a legal border crossing.
Not a trump tard, nor a republican for that matter.
You can enter the country legally and then apply for asylum status. That right is available at any legal border crossing into the United States. Also, reread the original news article and you’ll see the woman was not in the US yet but was actively attempting to break the law. US border patrol has no obligation to help someone in Mexico break into the US.
On your second point, are these international laws the United States has signed and agreed to? Similar to how the ICJ works, the US has no legal obligation to follow “international law” that it didnt agree to.
Wait you forgave the killer that quickly?