I’ve also seen the image with the dog. It was on posted originally 4chan. And the dog was obviously fake there. Is it really so hard for you to believe that when burning down homes with families hiding in them, babies will also get burned to death?

You mean you trust a random 4chan post more than a news organization and the PM of Israel.

The user you replied to doesn’t treat it as a black or white issue, though. They just aren’t posting Hamas apologia like the rest of the commenters here.

Dude the link contains images. Are you going to tell me the images are fake? And propaganda is not necessarily false. It’s just meant to be convincing.

Distrusting a source is different to disputing evidence. do you dispute the evidence?

Which intelligence agency is that? Israel’s “Hasbara” (propaganda) minister just quit (was fired) because she was somehow even more incompetent than the rest of the government.

Hamas propaganda is even more impressive, apparently.

Gaza city is a city within the Gaza strip. Israel told them to evacuate south of wadi Gaza. It’s obviously impractical for all those people to evacuate in reasonable time but they do have where to go.

You know you can read about it yourself instead of asking strangely suggestive questions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Gaza_(2007)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governance_of_the_Gaza_Strip

You can’t unilaterally declare peace. That’s just an oxymoron.

1. If X is a necessary motive for Y, then in the absence of X, Y cannot happen.
2. Innovation can happen in the absence of a profit motive.
3. Therefore, the profit motive is not necessary for innovation.

If the profit motive is not the only motive that drives innovation, as you just agreed, then it isn’t necessary, logically. And not sure why you would then go on to expand the definition of profit into meaninglessness after agreeing there are other motives.

Consider math, it doesn’t make any empirical predictions on its own, as it is just a set of abstract symbols and rules. Do you consider mathematical facts to be a form of knowledge?

You can pay for those in cash and prepaid credit cards

Such as?

Cherry picking also rewrites the commits. This is equivalent to rebasing:

git branch -f orig_head
git reset target
git cherry-pick ..orig_head

Have you tried interactive rebase (rebase -i)? I find it very useful

I’m sorry but that’s incorrect. “Rewriting the commit history” is not possible in git, since commits are immutable. What rebase actually does is reapply each commit between upstream and head on top of upstream, and then reset the current branch to the last commit applied (This is by default, assuming no interactive rebase and other advanced uses). But don’t take my word for it, just read the manual. https://git-scm.com/docs/git-rebase

That’s called rebasing

You need to take some shrooms and realize you’re never really in control of yourself