deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I wonder if this guy is disliked by Americans as much they dislike that UHC CEO, or is it more?
We should really take the time to appreciate this man’s dedication to the grindset and professionalism. He woke up earlier than most executives to get this once in a lifetime opportunity. He arranged travel plans by bus to execute on a plan that, by all objective measures, worked. Really they’re just upset the murderer did it better.
deleted by creator
There’s a difference between being annoying online and being hated because you think Scrooge McDuck wasn’t greedy enough. No one is going to ice you for having bad tales on the Internet.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Real. I don’t think the average American can correctly identify the oligarch culprits in most cases, this is the exception.
Don’t say that shit here. It’s called the FEDiverse because it’s full of feds.
deleted by creator
Also this guy did it without undermining the global vaccine movement. Thanks Obama!
And they certainly don’t ever go on the lolita express.
The guy was shot with his own words. Nothing innocent about it.
Can’t even imagine the life insurance policy check she’s about to receive.
They don’t have a problem with what is being done, just who are the ones doing it.
The reminds me of what Zizek said of the liberals: they are very cynical. “We need to do things we don’t believe are good, maybe even bad, but it works”
It’s in the best interest of the DNC to adopt policies and campaign approaches that have the best chance of winning.
The donors and the consultants making the bulk of the decisions disagree. The donors are motivated to shape policy, not win elections. The consultants are motivated to raise money, not win elections. They literally tell us they would rather loose than be disloyal to Biden by criticizing his legacy.
Did the Dems gain significant votes by offering Liz Cheney a seat at the table?
Having a big tent isn’t winning the election. They need to be offering seats at the table.
Ahh yes, efficiency to “improve the … stewardship of taxpayer dollars”. So instead of actually delivering better services, they can more efficiently deny those services. Sound familiar?