I’m in the market to find a new distro that is similar enough to Fedora that switching won’t be as laborious as I’ve had it before. I keep hearing POP!_os is a good choice but I’m going to as the community what they think is good.

  • 4L3moNemo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s your chance to turn away from rpm/RHEL distros and run without looking back. As last 20 years history shows, that branch of linux OS is either dying off on hands, leaving you without suport, either makes migration path complicated by a need to change distro. Like it was with centos +5…10 years, oh no … -> maybe fedora -> oh no … -> whatever whocares rpm pop/rocky/alma name it … Thats it, beat it, no more this shit.

    deb or any other kind linux is a way to go.

  • lfromanini@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally, I use Debian, but it’s a different approach from Fedora. My suggestion for you is to try OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. It’s a rolling release, which means bleeding edge software as Fedora, it’s RPM based and it’s easy to rollback in case of an update breaks something. As I said, not my type of distro (I want 0 breaks), but I used OpenSUSE once while distro hopping and it’s a good distro.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s funny. When the maintainer of AT&T unix’s perf group was looking at a distro to clone and support, RPM>Deb was 90% why debs were excluded.

      Maybe something changed dramatically since then.

      • shermozle@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean Adrian? He’s an odd duck and I wouldn’t take his choices at this level as anything other than some obscure tiny performance improvement.

        My issue with RPM is even the official packages didn’t put files where the standard they wrote said. Admittedly I haven’t used an RPM distro in 20 years so it’s possible things have changed.

  • topnomi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recently moved from Linux mint to opensuse tumbleweed and I’ve been VERY happy. Super stable. Even through multiple dist-upgrades.

  • Southern Wolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re going for a similar Fedora-like experience, with it being a rolling release that is still stable, then OpenSuse Tumbleweed is definitely you’re best bet.

    Now, if the rolling release nature is something you’re less attached to, then some good options would be Pop!_OS (especially if you have an Nvidia card), another Ubuntu-spin like Kubuntu perhaps or even KDE Neon, and maybe Debian 12. Though for the last one, although it’s a fantastic distro, it looks nice, new, and shiny now, but in 6-12 months when you’re not even half way through the Debian upgrade cycle and still on old software, will that bother you? If the answer is yes, then look elsewhere. Otherwise, Debian 12 may be a good choice for you as well.

  • echo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any specific reason why you’d like to move away from Fedora? It’s an amazing distro, all things considered.

  • Yote.zip@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would recommend the following in descending order:

    1. OpenSUSE Tumbleweed
    2. Linux Mint
    3. Debian Testing
    4. Debian Stable

    I think you’ll be right at home on OpenSUSE Tumbleweed.

    • meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I personally recommend against using Debian Testing for anything other than testing the next Debian release. It gets slower security updates, and breakages get fixed slower than just using Sid directly. Since Sid has its own securirt team and since it moves faster, breakages are fixed sooner. Even in the official documentation Debian doesn’t not suggest using Testing for the same reasons.