• irmoz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Stop being so dramatic and conspiratorial. The pushback is because it sucks. AI can’t be genuinely creative.

    • Risk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conspiratorial? What?

      Large Language Models cannot be genuinely creative; I agree. The people using them can. Why is that disagreeable?

            • Risk@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, I really didn’t - but I can’t exactly stop your confirmation bias.

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sighhhhh

                it is so tiresome being lied to when the evidence is a short scroll above

                it really does stink of being obstinately against change for no reason other than it being change.

                • Risk@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  As I said, I can’t fix your confirmation bias.

                  I wasn’t pointing to a conspiracy, merely the fact that the criticism voiced so far doesn’t have any substance to it other than ‘I don’t like it’ and therefore is likely because it’s new and different.

                  Edit:

                  I just realised you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as ‘art’ with artists making a case they’ve been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

                  Those are two different topics.

                  • irmoz@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    doesn’t have any substance to it other than ‘I don’t like it’ and therefore is likely because it’s new and different.

                    So, just being against progress. Like I said.

                    you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as ‘art’ with artists making a case they’ve been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

                    Lol no.