• _wintermute@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or you know, the workers work for themselves instead of the billionaire class. Too much nuance though right?

    • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s socialism, communism is a stateless classless society.

      So in some ways, people are right when they say the USSR isn’t communist: Because it’s literally impossible to implement it.

    • sizeoftheuniverse@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Communism we had to work for the Party Elite.

      So, communism has it’s owm ruling class, it’s just that they are not called billionaires.

      • CynAq@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who told you western teenagers were too dumb to understand this fact and would fail to include the remedies to their ideology when they rile up against capitalism?

      • Darorad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The problem is that places like the USSR were just authoritarian using communist wordsand concepts to keep people in line. It was just state-run capitalism. Communism is fundamentally about not having a ruling class.

        Just like the “democratic” people’s republic of Korea isn’t a democracy, the USSR wasn’t socialist.