• UnspecificGravity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cognos Analytics at work and like a lot of folks there’s a cheap IBM server card in my media center supporting an array for network storage.

      That’s not counting the dozens of IBM products that are at the various levels of all the networks we travel through online.

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        10 months ago

        And that’s what they have adds for on X? Some software and hardware that’s like 1% of their revenue? And they are one of the biggest add buyers? That’s the insane part. It would make more sense for Samsung or apple to buy adds for phones or laptops, you know, things everyone uses. IBM doesn’t have consumer products. Why are they spending so much money on X?

        • 🦘min0nim🦘@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          10 months ago

          The whole premise of ads on Twitter is that they’re targeted.

          IBM don’t sell consumer crap. They sell smoke and mirrors to major governments and industry. They’re chasing jobs worth millions per pop. They want ads to target the people making those decisions.

          • Ilgaz@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Actually I saw IBM consultant for a very large corp suggested Dell terminals while IBM end user things existed. For a modern mainframe, a PC is just a terminal emulator, browser (extensively used) and a development machine.

          • ExLisper@linux.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            This would only make sense if targeting rich individuals was somehow significantly more expensive. They’re showing ads to very small group of X users. Their ads cost the same as other ads. They should not be spending more than companies selling consumer products.

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think it’s like those commercials you sometimes see like during a big sporting event or something where it’s over and you’re like - what company is that and why would I care? They really do sometimes put an ad out in front of millions of eyes knowing there are only a few dozen in the audience who would care. But those eyes have the power to make million dollar purchases for their companies.

          • PowerGloveSoBad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            But that’s so inefficient-- what if half weren’t paying attention? Just pick one or two, and send a $12M escort with beer to “win them over.” Easier, and the money goes to people that deserve it instead of ad agencies.

            • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              They’re also doing that when they know specific names and addresses but that isn’t always the case. Lots of Americans watch the super bowl and there’s a good chance a couple of them do million dollar purchases for what they sell or might do that in the near future.

              Same reason why higher end car companies advertise heavily in league of legends which is played by mostly younger people who don’t have much money yet. Sure there are some that can afford to buy those cars but also some kids who’ll grow into careers where they eventually be able to afford those cars.