• cosmic_slate@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Huge doubt. Mastodon only has 1.6 million active people source, it’s practically a rounding error compared to all of Meta’s properties.

      Threads had ~65x as many people sign up in a month, and even though many dropped off, Threads is on track (as of Sept) to reach 23.7 million users. source.

      The fediverse is certainly a thing that needs to grow but I think it’s real-world impact right now is greatly exaggerated.

      • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wow 23.7 million active users seems surprisingly high compared to Twitter’s projected 56.1.

        Yeah the fediverse’s real-world impact is definitely miniscule currently, but I can’t seem to trust even a tiny bit in Meta to not pull the EEE plug. I understand your opinion tho.

        • cosmic_slate@dmv.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly I was surprised so many people still use Twitter.

          I just figure if Threads federates, it means one less reason for people to say “well Mastodon has nobody on it” because they can just add people on Threads. I think more people would leave Threads for Mastodon than Mastodon for Threads.

          • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s in the source:

            Instagram’s Threads is forecast to have 23.7 million monthly active users in the US by the end of this year as opposed to X’s 56.1 million, according to Insider Intelligence.