• CopernicusQwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s interesting how populations are now growing extremely wary of hosting these events, though overwhelmingly enjoy watching them take place elsewhere. Peak NIMBY.

    Just earlier this year Melbourne in Australia pulled the plug for the Commonwealth Games, citing cost blowouts, and now the CG are scrambling to find a new host given that there are zero cities interested in hosting.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Honestly, they should build one location for all games and just keep it maintained.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        You could even have a guest host country for some of the games. Play most of the sports in the primary location, and have satellite location(s) for a handful of events. That would reduce the burden on smaller host countries and allow the Olympics to shine spotlights on other countries.

      • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s a really good idea.

        In the past, cities were clambering over wanting to host the Olympics because it would normally boost their revenue but recent years have shown so much more cost & trouble & local upheaval involved in building the venues.

        never forget the 2016 Apocalypse Olympics Apocalympics.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I was living in NYC when then Mayor Bloomberg was pushing hard to get the 2012 Games. Not a single citizen I knew was in anyway interested in hosting, and almost everyone was actively against the idea. In a sane world, there’d be one or two super arenas in constant use [FIFA, Olympics, etc]