ASD jab: Chinese scientists reach milestone in revolutionary gene therapy for autism::undefined

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I like your ideas since it’s the type I need for my writing of fantasy stories. I have quite many wild ideas myself and try to push them to the limit. But, in this area, it’s hard to fend off the disbelief of the reader.

    • LavaPlanet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or fend off the ablism of trying to eradicate autism, instead of just forming a more inclusive world.

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        ableism : Discrimination against persons with disabilities or in favour of those without.

        Hum, right, I get what you are saying here.
        I believe it’s a gray area. And it is hard to draw the line of what’s a disease and what’s diversity.
        For instance, we heard the same speech from deaf people not wanting their deaf kids to wear cochlear thingnies. I say it’s for the kids to make the choice.

        • Perhyte@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If a deaf person decides to get an implant, or their (hearing?) parents decide for them, and later decides they no longer want it then it’s pretty much reversible, right? They can just not turn it on, or perhaps even have it removed again?

          This article is talking about gene therapy, not an assistive device. It’s probably a much more permanent decision.