• michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Except the major source everyone cites is one psycho who composes his data exclusively by going through news reports of dog attacks and determining it was a pit bull if any news source called it a pit bull rather than any scientific methodology whatsoever

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Super reliable! You know, the same news sources that call every 1-hand bang-bang-thingy a “glock”, a wooden two-hand bang-bang-thingy an AK-47, and a black shovel an Assault-Rifle-15-mall-sweeping-military-style-bump-stock-war-machine assault weapon.

      Yeah I’m sure they’re great at differentiating dog breeds too! XD

    • rab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      What reason would someone have to do that though? Probably was attacked by a pitbull in the past lol