Japan prepares regulation requiring Apple to allow sideloading::As the Digital Markets Act antitrust law passed in the European Union, Apple has until March 2024 to let users…

  • pearable@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Having app developers be able to avoid Apples forced 30% fee is great. The fee is pure rent seeking masquerading as curation.

    • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      30% might be a bit much, but Apple and Google are offering ongoing services for the price you pay as a developer. From hosting, to payment processing and APIs you can use in your apps, I think what they’re offering has some monetary value that would be acceptable if it wasn’t so damn much. I don’t think it’s toxic rent-seeking in and of itself. What’s pretty toxic is that there’s no way around those fees on Apple phones and tablets.

      • chitak166@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 months ago

        The #1 thing they provide is exposure.

        The vast majority of users simply won’t download and install something they find on a website on their phones.

      • pearable@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Agreed, If it wasn’t a forced arrangement I wouldn’t necessarily nave a problem with the price