I’m looking to replace my portable modem with a GL.iNet router because I saw that they claim to use OpenWRT which is a open source firmware.

My question is:

Is their OpenWRT version actually reliable?

  • StarkZarn@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you have any question on truth worthiness, you can flash stock openwrt on them. You just lose out on their proprietary webUI and pre installed plugins. I believe their firmware is public on GitHub though.

      • catacomb@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The biggest issue most people have with it is the dynamic DNS feature, which is automatically enabled and contacts their server to create the record. If you turn this off before connecting the router to the internet, you’re probably good.

        The simplified DoH client also only allows either Cloudflare or NextDNS, which aren’t the most privacy-oriented options. Still, it’s possible to set up your own.

        Otherwise I’ve never heard of anything major; the devices are cheap and reliable. I’ve had one running constantly for years and only had to reboot it manually once.

      • StarkZarn@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I haven’t done a code review so I can’t answer that question with facts. I do think however, that anything that bootstraps a FLOSS framework like openwrt could easily be a risk to privacy.

        You use privacy and security interchangeably here. They are not the same.

  • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I bought a Slate Plus just last month and simply flashed it with vanilla OpenWRT as soon as I opened the box. I certainly wouldn’t trust the stock firmware, but this is so easy to remedy it’s barely worth talking about.

    • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      On OpenWRT official Table of Hardware from what I researched, it only lists older models and not new ones, I’m afraid of buying them and not being able to install vanilla OpenWRT on them.1000087187

  • Sailing7@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Their plugins arent really reliable. Can tell you that. The Mullvad VPN Plugin does not like it at all if you ever should run out of VPN Time. If your VPN is not being paid the connection shits itself and doesnt reconnect properly when the VPN is being paid for again. Besides that, the Seamless-Tunnel Option (aka. dont allow network traffic if its not through the VPN) is working but hella buggy if you want to disable it for testing.

    Got myself a Opal one. Not sure what I will be using it from now on tbh. Maybe the other Options are more reliable but I couldnt be bothered to check em out in the last months.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    an open source firmware

    Firmware isn’t a countable, any more than you’d say “a traffic” as a noun.