• Allah@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    some small problems i face is that

    while i use youtube it runs slower.

    and the quick image search feature using google lens is not present.

    and telegram voice call does not work.

    • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where as,
      youtube = googlie
      google lens = googlie
      and
      telegram via web requires chromium api, so = googlie

      Hmm, proprietary things that are totally under the control of the corpo in question run slower or not at all on the corpo’s competitor’s browser. I wonder if that isn’t exactly what avoid a monoculture is all about preventing?

    • themachine@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah yes, google nerfing its own services under another browser for its own gain definitely isn’t the issue here.

    • DePietPiraat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can use a different frontend for YouTube. You’ve got Freetube for pc, Yattee for MacOS and iOS and piped on any platform. These solutions also protect your privacy and block ads.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If only they actually worked. Never understand how they get recommended constantly and yet repeatedly I try to use them and they don’t work.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is that one a desktop app? I primarily use pop_OS and would prefer a web solution. I’ve tried piped, invidious, peertube, and libretube iirc

            • seth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m with you, and would prefer a browser based frontend for yt that doesn’t brick. I see no reason for standalone apps anymore whenever the data is exclusively online. On the other hand, I hate how webapp versions of Excel/Spreadsheets (for instance) are pushed for office software, where the data has no need to live in the cloud. At home I stick with LibreOffice, as the only issue I’ve had with switching over to it was VBA scripts and macros I wrote over a decade ago not working - and those really needed to be updated anyway.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah invidious (different instance) worked for me a couple weeks and then went down for days. I tried some other mirrors after that and they did not work.

            If they were reliable, I could put up with the worse UX, but so far they haven’t been reliable for me

      • Wannade@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        My problem with these is that the quality is always bad. Usually 720p max and only H.264 instead of VP9. YouTube quality is already bad enough as it is and nerfing it even more feels awful.

    • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s because YouTube detects the browser you are using, and slows it down for browsers that aren’t their own.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      and the quick image search feature using google lens is not present

      There’s an addon that not only adds that back into the right click menu but also adds support for other image searching services!

      Its called “search by image” and it works very well ime