• Users of those services will be steered toward the web
  • Searches indicate apps from Meta may also be unavailable

Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/4kfYI

  • herrvogel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    None of those had a point nearly as questionable as this headset thing. The ipod was an advanced mp3 player, which was very popular and common tech at the time. The iPhone was an advanced phone with a large touchscreen, which was rapidly becoming very common at the time. The iPad was an advanced tablet, which was a concept that had already been tried many times by many other companies by then. The air pods are just advanced wireless earbuds, which nobody could ever deny were rapidly becoming more popular.

    VR headsets are fundamentally different from all of those, in that there’s no technological and social precedence quite like it. People used mp3 players and watches and phones before Apple did something new. Nobody was wondering the point of a better mp3 player that could hold massive amounts of songs. But the history of humankind says nothing about the masses’ willingness to walk around in public with big ass high tech ski goggles strapped to their faces. VR is much, much more unknown compared to those.

    • ji17br@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I get what you’re saying, and regarding people walking around in public wearing a headset, I completely agree. It’ll be a very long time before that happens, if ever.

      I disagree that AR won’t become more ubiquitous in people’s lives. Right now, the biggest gripe I see when people talk about Vision Pro is the price. Which was also the case with all the other Apple products I mentioned. The price will come down, it’ll get more features, and it will become more attractive to consumers.

      Only time will tell which of us will be right.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        The iPhone had 2 interesting things going for it. Everyone had been begging for an iPod phone for years before this happened. Apple had been working on the iPad since the Newton failed and the iPhone was a combination between iPod phone and iPad.

        All glass all touch screens were not a thing people thought they wanted before Apple made a really compelling (and pleasing) device.

        AR has been a thing for years, but hasn’t garnered the popularity or utility that MP3s and phones ever had. QR codes being the possible exception and only since most phones handle them natively at this stage.

        It’s possible that AR just hasn’t had a good enough UX to break the “cool experiment bro” uses imagined so far (because of screen/camera/movement limitations). It’ll be interesting to see if Apple has managed to revolutionize the experience enough to imagine new and more widely needed AR uses or not.

    • Eggyhead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If you have a computer space with multiple monitors with various equipment interfacing with it cluttering up a desk at your home, imagine all of that just completely gone, cleaned up, with nothing there but a recliner and a headset that can even go with you.

      I think this is the value proposition. The price is too high for me, but I don’t think there’s anything to be confused about. The smart watch and iPad took more for me to wrap my head around than this.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        When they get it down to rad sunglasses I’ll wear them everywhere.

        I love my Quest headset, but I haven’t turned it on in 6 months. I don’t have time to be isolated like that without asking other people to make sacrifices for me so I can have that time.

        I think the tech will be important in the future. I could be wrong, but when it shrinks down and becomes easy to remove isolation, I think people will want it.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        The thing is, I don’t want those replaced by a headset. I have a total of 5 monitors on my home setup, and I can’t see a reason to replace any of them. Especially with a headset that’s likely going to be uncomfortable, heavy and isolating. I just can’t see any case where a headset could be even remotely close to preferable.

        A recliner would probably decrease my enjoyment of the setup anyways, as I much prefer a physical desk, chair and monitors.

        • Eggyhead@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          That sounds like a pretty epic setup! Fortunately no one is forcing you to replace anything. You’re free to keep and make the most of what you’ve spent your own money on, just like anyone else.

          Actually, I’m sure you more than most can appreciate why others who don’t already have a setup like yours might want to look at a headset as an option.