Summary: Meta, led by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is investing billions in Nvidia’s H100 graphics cards to build a massive compute infrastructure for AI research and projects. By end of 2024, Meta aims to have 350,000 of these GPUs, with total expenditures potentially reaching $9 billion. This move is part of Meta’s focus on developing artificial general intelligence (AGI), competing with firms like OpenAI and Google’s DeepMind. The company’s AI and computing investments are a key part of its 2024 budget, emphasizing AI as their largest investment area.

    • whodatdair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      11 months ago

      Gold rush you say?

      Shovels for sale!

      Get your shovels here! Can’t strike it rich without a shovel!

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I feel like a pretty big winner too. Meta has been quite generous with releasing AI-related code and models under open licenses, I wouldn’t be running LLMs locally on my computer without the stuff they’ve been putting out. And I didn’t have to pay a penny to them for it.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    Who isn’t at this point? Feels like every player in AI is buying thousands of Nvidia enterprise cards.

    • 31337@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      The equivalent of 600k H100s seems pretty extreme though. IDK how many OpenAI has access to, but it’s estimated they “only” used 25k to train GPT4. OpenAI has, in the past, claimed the diminishing returns on just scaling their model past GPT4s size probably isn’t worth it. So, maybe Meta is planning on experimenting with new ANN architectures, or planning on mass deployment of models?

      • qupada@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        The estimated training time for GPT-4 is 90 days though.

        Assuming you could scale that linearly with the amount of hardware, you’d get it down to about 3.5 days. From four times a year to twice a week.

        If you’re scrambling to get ahead of the competition, being able to iterate that quickly could very much be worth the money.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Would that be diminishing returns on quality, or training speed?

        If I could tweak a model and test it in an hour vs 4 hours, that could really speed up development time?

        • 31337@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Quality. Yeah, using the extra compute to increase speed of development iterations would be a benefit. They could train a bunch of models in parallel and either pick the best model to use or use them all as an ensemble or something.

          My guess is that the main reason for all the GPUs is they’re going to offer hosting and training infrastructure for everyone. That would align with the strategy of releasing models as “open” then trying to entice people into their cloud ecosystem. Or, maybe they really are trying to achieve AGI as they state in the article. I don’t really know of any ML architectures that would allow for AGI though (besides the theoretical, incomputable AIXI).

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is great! I thought there would be a chips LED recession. Sorry homeless people but you’re gonna have to wait another generation to try and get online to maybe buy a house someday far far away… and also some day far far away if you get my drift.

  • Deceptichum@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I really hope they fail hard and end up putting these devices on the consumer second hand market because the v100’s while now affordable and flooding the market are too out of date.

  • elgordio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    total expenditures potentially reaching $9 billion

    I imagine they negotiated quite the discount in that.

    • DdCno1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Agreed. There’s volume discount, and then there is “Facebook data center with an energy consumption of a small country volume discount”.