Those times you see an oddly specific and very weird rule and you just know there’s probably a great story around it.

The never ending diapers that would be 10 kids…

We had a 2 week window 2 or 3 days after earnings were released.

Edit: You could preschedule sales though like recurring once a month, but it wouldn’t take effect immediately. I can’t remember what the delay on that was, but it might have been starting after the next earnings?

At what PSI are you almost just driving on the rims? I get that on sand that wouldn’t be an issue, but 10psi sounds like rims on a road to me?

Probably less than the same amount of developers whose code runs on the first try.

And ya, it did provide some useful info, so it’s not like it was all wrong.

I’m more just surprised that it was wrong in that way.

Because I had some methods I thought were too complex and I wanted to see what it’d come up with?

In one case part of the method was checking if a value was within one of 4 ranges and it just dropped 2 of the ranges in the output.

I don’t think that’s asking too much of it.

My experience with an AI coding tool today.

Me: Can you optimize this method.

AI: Okay, here’s an optimized method.

Me seeing the AI completely removed a critical conditional check.

Me: Hey, you completely removed this check with variable xyz

Ai: oops you’re right, here you go I fixed it.

It did this 3 times on 3 different optimization requests.

It was 0 for 3

Although there was some good suggestions in the suggestions once you get past the blatant first error

It was all that time he spent in a closet with Vanna White. He would’ve won otherwise.

Just to further clarify this…

They did the suborbital thing because they wanted to ensure it came in over the ocean.

If they went orbital, and anything went wrong, they’d have lost control of where it would deorbit and land, potentially putting people at risk.

So sure the rocket did not reach orbit.

No one with even a pinch of knowledge on the topic would ever try to dispute they could have if they wanted.

It was for our saftey that they didn’t.

You gotta not fuck up every day to not get served if they are looking for you.

The AG only needs to wait patiently for that 1 fuck up.

Sometimes, the AG gets it all wrapped up like a nice birthday present.

Loved this when it was new!! Highly recommend it.

Ah, assuming that’s what’s behind the paywall that makes much more sense.

I mean… I’m up in Canada but in one of the highest cost of living cities in the country which isn’t as bad as San Francisco or NYC but it’s bad…

20k is 1666 a month extra.

The only thing thats gone up $1666 a month more would be a larger house.

Fancy 1 bedrooms are up to 2000-2500 and they were never $334 to 734 even 15 years ago.

Something is wrong with that headline or their math

I was gonna say 3rd times the charm but it clearly isn’t.

These things cost billions to create. Those billions are often (or should be anyway) spread out over the millions of people who can use the drug.

When a drug is a one time cure, for something that is rare, it becomes incredibly difficult to make any money back on that unless the cost is incedibly high, or it’s government subsidized.

That’s why a lot of things we probably could cure aren’t cured yet. It just doesn’t make sense financially to do it. And if they do do it, people like you get angry at them.

This is much less of a problem in a public single payer system, but even then some of those systems don’t cover these kinds of treatments.

getting stronger after each failed attempt.

Why would that be a decided upon outcome? There’s gotta be a reason for that intention

Dude, I was literally in another thread where someone posted a video talking about how many deaths FSD caused (17) and extrapolating those numbers by how many FSD miles were driven lead to fsd being 11x more dangerous than a humans driver.

It had all sorts of upvotes.

Except, those accidents were on AP which has multiple billions of miles driven, not FSD. The NHSTA has only said there was 1 fsd related death. Related, as in, not confirmed to be the cause of.

They don’t even know what they’re mad about. And i get downvoted for showing the major flaw in their post.

I bet they’ve never used, or had to acknowledge the warnings prior to using AP. Let alone the even more dire warning FSD gives (or gave prior to v12 anyway, not sure what today’s warnings are)

That comment was wrong. I pointed out why in a reply.

That number is like 1.5 billion now and rising exponentially fast.

Also those deaths weren’t all FSD they were AP.

The report says 1 FSD related (not caused by but related) death. For whatever reason the full details on that one weren’t released.

Edit: There are billions of miles on AP. In 2020 it was 3 billion

Edit: Got home and I tried finding AP numbers through 2024 but haven’t seen anything recent, but given 3 billion 2020, and 2 billion in 2019, and an accelerating rate of usage with increased car sales, 2023 is probably closer to 8 billion miles. I imagine we’d hear when they reach 10 billion.

So 8 billion miles, 16 AP fatalities (because that 1 FSD one isn’t the same) is 1 fatality per 500,000,000 miles, or put into the terms above by per 100mil miles, 0.2 fatalities per 100 million miles or 6.75 times less than a human produces. And nearly all of these fatal accidents were from blatant misuse of the system like driving drunk (at least a few) or using their phone and playing games.