alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoCarbon released by bottom trawling ‘too big to ignore’, says studywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1114arrow-down11
arrow-up1113arrow-down1external-linkCarbon released by bottom trawling ‘too big to ignore’, says studywww.theguardian.comalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squareNegativeInf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 months agoFor anyone wondering the difference between 370 million tonnes and 37.5 billion tonnes, it’s about 37.5 billion tonnes.
minus-squareTimecircleline@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months ago370 million is just under 1% of 37.5 billion. It’s obviously far from the majority but I can see it being something that should be addressed.
minus-squareNegativeInf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoOh, agreed. I just think there are better metrics we can point at other than carbon release for why bottom trawling is a terrible thing for the environment.
minus-squarefoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·7 months ago37.1 billion, but yeah
minus-squareRivalarrival@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months ago370 million is 0.37 billion, so the difference is about 37.13 billion. 370 million tons of carbon from a single source is a considerable amount.
For anyone wondering the difference between 370 million tonnes and 37.5 billion tonnes, it’s about 37.5 billion tonnes.
370 million is just under 1% of 37.5 billion. It’s obviously far from the majority but I can see it being something that should be addressed.
Oh, agreed. I just think there are better metrics we can point at other than carbon release for why bottom trawling is a terrible thing for the environment.
37.1 billion, but yeah
370 million is 0.37 billion, so the difference is about 37.13 billion.
370 million tons of carbon from a single source is a considerable amount.