• intrepid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Printers are the text book examples of why device manufacturing shouldn’t be left to big companies. You have tracking dots, spyware infestation, subscription for ink/toners, reporting of the cartridge as empty when you still have much left in it, refusal to print when unused color cartridges are empty, intentional bricking if 3rd party cartridges or ink is used, and utterly crappy firmware in general.

    Inkjets require precision manufacturing. But assembling it or other types from components should be possible - like how desktops, mechanical keyboards, etc can be. We really need to ditch filthy mass market printers because DIY printers will be much better than anything they offer.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m pretty sure this measure was requested either by the government or some big three letter agency.

      I doubt that, if all printers were manufactured by a government monopoly, you wouldn’t have this shit baked in. It would probably be way worse

      • intrepid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m not at all asking for a government monopoly on making printers, if that wasn’t clear.

        • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I do think it shoukd be left up to (potentially big) companies; however, we should put restrictions on e.g. ink cartrige compatibility, just like what the EU is trying for smartphones and messagin right now.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s insufferable how people will respond to “We shouldn’t let corporations do this” with “OK SO YOU WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO DO IT?!?!”

          • Pandemanium@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s insufferable that the answer is always “build your own.” Lemmy assumes that every single person on the planet is an engineer with enough free time to design, build, and troubleshoot every device they own.

            • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              It’s based in rugged hypercapitalist bootstrap thinking. If something is broken just do it yourself! Even though that’s never realistic, and even if it were, no one person can or should be expected to do everything.

  • Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s weird that when it comes to security companies are like “we got too many important things to be doing, like adding this quarters new shiny feature, we don’t have time to encrypt user data”.

    You would think that when it comes to adding obscure tracking codes companies would be like “we don’t care what people print, it’s not our problem, we aren’t going to bother with tracking watermarks”. But, no, every company has tracking watermarks while cutting every other corner possible.

    I mean, half the companies out there are barely able to get their software to work, meanwhile printer companies have this robust watermark system that never fails. I don’t understand these priorities.

    Where’s my tinfoil hat?

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well for starters. Consumers in general have very little rights in the United States.

      Meanwhile you don’t wanna fuck with either the Secret Service, The IRS, or the Federal Reserve.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s how Reality Winner got real fucked.

    via Wikiedpia:

    Both journalists and security experts have suggested that The Intercept’s handling of the reporting, which included publishing the documents unredacted and including the printer tracking dots, was used to identify Winner as the leaker. In October 2020, The Intercept’s co-founding editor Glenn Greenwald wrote that Winner had sent her documents to The Intercept’s New York newsroom with no request that any specific journalist work on them. He called her exposure a “deeply embarrassing newsroom failure” resulting from “speed and recklessness” for which he was publicly blamed “despite having no role in it.” He said editor-in-chief Betsy Reed “oversaw, edited and controlled that story.” An internal review conducted by The Intercept into its handling of the document provided by Winner found that its “practices fell short of the standards to which we hold ourselves”.

    • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      A technology that was made To Stop Criminals™ being used against a political whistleblower? Color me surprised! (thanks for sharing the link btw, didn’t know about that)

    • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I find that a large number of conspiracy theories are asking the right questions, just not providing the right answers. Does big tech want to control our minds with 5G towers and microchips hidden in covid vaccines? Probably not. Does big tech want to control our minds with social media and invasive advertising? Absolutely. Is the world controlled by a secret society of lizard people? Probably not. Is the world controlled by a not-so-secret society of billionaires and politicians? To a large extent. Even those awful racist or bigoted conspiracy theories start to sound somewhat palpable palatable if you filter out the racist or bigoted part. Do Jews make life for the rest of us miserable by controlling the economy? No. But replace “Jews” with “the owning class”, and suddenly it kind of makes sense.

      EDIT: Is the government putting chemicals in the water that turn frogs gay? No. Are corporations putting chemicals in water bottles that turn frogs into hermaphrodites? Literally yes

      EDIT PART TWO - ELECTRIC BOOGALOO: Palatable, not palpable. Words are hard.

  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wikipedia has a good article on it, including photos of what the marks look like. They’re practically invisible to the naked eye, getting them to show up usually requires additional steps like taking high quality scans and running them through some color filters, or using a UV light.

    From the EFF coverage of it, it sounds like every laser printer probably prints these marks now. I’m not sure if inkjets or other printer types do or not.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    All of this just makes me want an open source printer. Anyone know of a color laser printer which uses open source firmware?

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you’re going to do illegal shit, or shit against the owner class, don’t use modern technology to do it.

    • kintrix@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Halfway competent criminals know how to prevent it. But at the same time, I am simply against any and all non-consensual tracking.

      I have a similar stance on this as DRM.