• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        And even then, the filament needed at this scale will take another several years, and a few days for shipping.

        Also, it doesn’t do well in sunlight or high humidity for prolonged periods of time, so we’ll need maybe 20 to 30 years to work out a solution for that problem.

        • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I can only assume they’re trying to talk about concrete 3D printing, but oh boy is that not ready for anything which needs strength.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah, but how much worse than normal unreinforced concrete? (Which is actually fine if you aren’t worried about tension)

                  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Certain arches or domes, maybe a lining for a tunnel. A tower if it’s not very windy. Really just all the stuff the Romans built, since that’s what they were working with, and their volcanic ash-based cement was somewhat weaker than modern cement.

                    It would be pretty hard to print between rebar. You’d need a crazy multi-axis head, and at that point it’s probably cheaper to just build a form. If they can achieve some significant strength with long fibers, which seems likely, you could spool that into the stream of concrete, but just concrete is already an actively researched problem. Printing one big form in foam or plastic and then filling it could be considered. The manual equivalent certainly makes a great building, especially in harsh climates where insulation is a concern.