• Reawake9179@lemmy.kde.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imagine buying premium to watch videos riddled with ads and sponsors in the video itself.

    This format just isn’t making any sense for me, they would’ve implemented something as sponsorblock years ago

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think Google engineers drag their feet on this.

          Like - Google’s pre-installed corporate Firefox and Chrome both have ad blockers. Ublock origin is installed by default on Firefox (I can’t remember what was installed on chrome, I only used it for the work suite/cloudtop and did everything else on FF).

          Nobody I worked with at Google liked ads… But I didn’t work at YouTube. So maybe it’s different there.

          But I suspect the engineers are doing it just to show management that they’re doing something but it’s half hearted.

          Real efforts and real threats of it getting locked down, sure, but half hearted effort.

      • fossphi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s already a patch for comments in the release candidate for the new version

  • Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Gotta love this shit. Conservatives/companies: “Let the market decide!” The market: “We are tired of you cramming ads down our throats and fundamentally do not want it and will actively fight you on it.” Companies: “Waaaaaa, they are fighting us.”

      • Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        “A company should be able to decide not to do business with individuals for ideological reasons.”

        Twitter, Facebook, etc. start filtering misinformation and banning offenders.

        “Mah freedoms are being infringed!”

  • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Damn, I got my setup so perfect on the TV with SmartTube. But I will not be able to tolerate ads. Then I’d rather only watch on Firefox with uBlock on my laptop.

        • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          So you want to use YouTube to stream videos, but don’t want to pay or watch ads?

          You just want people to give you shit for free?

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            On one hand, I think that by now it is by far a public service, in private hands.

            On the other hand, yes you do already pay by providing them information on your interests and other personal matters.

          • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not OP, but heck yeah free stuff! Special thanks to the people providing us Lemmy for free :)

              • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                How did Google manage to buy YouTube, and then make YouTube the video monopoly it currently is ? One of the pillars of that foundation is open source software used by Google, for free. Some of that open source software maintained for a long time by unpaid and sometimes burned out software developers. All the YT video watchers commenting here in this post wanting to pay content creators and wanting content creators live off that : Google is run by a few laughing billionaires who probably care most about shareholders and being able to make more money by exploiting ads on the billions of hooked end users. Besides paying YT and content creators consider supporting small scale open source projects as well. Help out wherever and whenever you can with open source software. Take back your digital sovereignty. Big tech is not your friend. Open source empowers and shares with others as in sharing is caring.

          • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That content does not belong to YouTube. And they also do not pay for 99% of it.

            YouTube depends on people to use it for it’s existence. They also depend on those users to upload content so that YouTube can then treat that content as if it is its own and monetize it.

            If I was in such a precarious position I wouldn’t go about making the experience crappy for those users that I’m desperately dependent upon.

      • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I did for many years. But then I moved to Korea and they don’t allow family plans and paying 4 individual ones is just not in our budget. Then probably just no YouTube for me.

  • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Are they going to officially allow third party apps at all? The stock app is terrible, and not just because of excessive, unskippable advertising and bizarre restrictions around background play. When you search for anything, at least half of the results are completely unrelated to what you searched for in an attempt to increase user engagement metrics. It keeps trying to get you to watch shorts in its bad TikTok clone. Sometimes it recommends unrelated shorts with disturbing thumbnails in the middle of your search results. It keeps autodetecting that the video quality should be 360p on a connection easily capable of 4k, and resetting back to 360p at the start of every new video. The UI for live streams puts things on top of other things that are more important.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      And all of those come down to money

      Search shows you random videos because “the algorithm” is hoping to drive you through to videos that are the most monetized and the most likely to keep you on the platform based on their data

      The shorts thing is because they can pack more ads into 15 second bits of content while using less bandwidth and they’re hoping to hijack your attention with an “endless stream” of short clips a la TikTok or instagram reels

      The video bandwidth drops to low every time because they’re hoping people will still watch, see the ads, and not bump the quality up, saving Google on bandwidth costs

      The live streams thing is just more advertising revenue again

      • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The live streams thing is not about advertising. Problems like putting the hearts button on top of the chat instead of next to the chat or having the chat cover up the entire left side of the stream every time a single message is sent are just because they don’t care.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        None of that applies if you’re a paying customer like me, and I see all the same bs. So no, it’s really just bad design, it’s not trying to do any of the stuff you mentioned.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Even that’s just a monetary decision. They are choosing not to spend money to build a custom “premium” experience for paying customers and instead just stripping ads, keeping the existing engagement/monetization driven UI in place. A customized UI takes more dev time, costs more in engineering labor, etc

    • datavoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      As soon as I have to see shorts, YouTube is dead to me. I hate the format with a passion.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      bizarre restrictions around background play

      there’s nothing bizarre about it - the free version is shitty on purpose

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The company shut down one of the most popular third-party apps, “YouTube Vanced,” in 2022.

    Vanced takes the official YouTube Android client and installs a duplicate, alternative version with a bunch of patches.

    It also adds features the official app doesn’t have, like additional themes and accessibility features, “repeat” and “dislike” buttons, and the ability to turn off addictive “suggestions” that appear all over the app.

    Rather than going after the projects, Google says it’s going to start disrupting users who are using these apps.

    The company continues: “We want to emphasize that our terms don’t allow third-party apps to turn off ads because that prevents the creator from being rewarded for viewership, and Ads on YouTube help support creators and let billions of people around the world use the streaming service.”

    If you remember back to when Google aggressively fought to keep third-party YouTube apps off of Windows Phone, the company seemed to take a similar stance against all third-party YouTube clients, even if they wanted to integrate ads.


    The original article contains 344 words, the summary contains 170 words. Saved 51%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Shurimal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Third party apps: “OK. We’ll show ads. Muted. Behind a black overlay. If we really can’t find a workaround.”

  • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    As soon as 3rd party clients don’t work as they do anymore, I am stopping going to YouTube. Simple as, I know it doesn’t matter as a singular thing, I am just one user. Was the same with reddit, now I am here but reddit is still going (how well we don’t need to debate now).

    • penquin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re not alone. Don’t think that. A lot of people will do the same. I’m right there with ya. Fuck YouTube

  • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve been using youtube on Firefox with ublock since the premium price raise. Even on android. The experience is not great, but that makes sure I don’t have ads at all.

    Also discovered unhooked addon yesterday. Is desktop only, but great for going into less youtube rabbit holes that waste my time.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Howso? You think even in the event this wasn’t being scraped, that there isn’t a single dev from YouTube, or a YouTube adjacent team possibly here?

          There’s a large (relative) tech worker user base on Lemmy.

          • priapus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            If they’re going to find it on lemmy they’re going to find it anywhere. Also, they already know about ublock origin, and its unlikely they’d even care about unhooked, since it doesn’t block ads.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              “there’s all this litter on the ground I’ll just throw my litter”

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  If you suck at critical thinking sure

                  Edit I’m not obligated to address every point, this aint debate club

          • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            It was a joke.

            And I think they are very much aware of uBlock. Unhooked got recommended to me by a Youtube video.

            They know.

          • SUPAVILLAIN@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            We disdain to hide sauce that could benefit the people. We don’t bogart knowledge like a settler would.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If they say like that, it means that’s now is allowed to make a third party youtube client with login support?

    I’d immediately install an officially sanctioned third party youtube app without shorts and without the algorithmic feed, if all i would need to do is let the phone play ads when i’m doing something else