• Alk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is non-news, like all tech companies, they are bound by law to do this. It happens more than 6000 times per year for Proton. However, this user just had bad opsec. Proton emails are all encrypted and cannot be read unless law enforcement gets your password, which Proton does not have access to. Even if Proton hands over all data.

    • ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Proton doesn’t get a free ride here.

      They are bound Swiss law and should not be retaining any identifying information.

      If they are going to give up everything they have on you when the feds come knocking, they shouldn’t keep anything or they shouldn’t market themselves as private and secure .

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Upon receiving the recovery email from Proton Mail, Spanish authorities further requested Apple to provide additional details linked to that email, leading to the identification of the individual.

        The user specifically requested that Proton retain this PII for account recovery.

        Speaking of which, how do they implement recovery emails? Do they save your private keys only if account recovery is enabled?

      • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        But if you use their service for free, you do not have to provide any identifying info. As far as I am aware there is no check what you enter is legit and there is no requirement to supply a backup address. So the whole solution for a user to stay anonymous as much as they can with Protonmail is simply to not enter any identifying info.

      • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, Proton does get a free ride here. The information they provided was the recovery email address, which they were required to do by law.

        The only data they don’t encrypt (can see) is that which they absolutely need to store unencrypted. If they encrypt your recovery email address, then… they can’t send you any recovery emails to it since they can’t see it.

        This is 100% the fault of the user.

        All any service can do is give you the best tools available to maintain your privacy, but they can’t stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.

        Firefox is also great for privacy, but if I use it to fill out some info on some phishing sites then that’s not a them problem.

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        How do you imagine a recovery email to work, if the provider doesn’t store it, and you lost access to your email by definition in the moment you need it? Recovery email is not needed, you can totally use your account without and proton doesn’t ask for it. It’s a feature where you obviously are disclosing that piece of information and link two accounts. It’s either that or not using that feature.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Proton’s mails are encrypted… between proton accounts. Send an email to a hotmail account and bye-bye encryption. Proton does rely on PGP so you can use that if the recipient supports it.

  • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They provided the backup e-mail address

    Upon receiving the recovery email from Proton Mail, Spanish authorities further requested Apple to provide additional details linked to that email, leading to the identification of the individual.

    Just in case anyone thinks they decrypted mails and handed them over, nope. I hadn’t thought about that “settings” are not encrypted. Guess if you want to stay anonymous you shouldn’t add your private mail address in there as a backup.

    • Alk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah. Even if they couldn’t hand over recovery emails, having a personal email as a backup to a “private and sensitive” email account is bad practice.

      • BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        But what do you do if that field is needed? A throwaway address won’t work as it’s easy to recreate. Buy your own domain and run a server?

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          I put the Simplelogin email alias as my backup mail. Which forwards mail to my proton, so I guess it isn’t really a backup. Even more so if you realize I need to sign into simplelogin with my protonmail account and protonmail owns Simplelogin.

        • Alk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t believe you need that field with Proton, correct me if I’m wrong. If you do need that field with an email provider, and you need complete opsec, use a different provider.

          • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            It wasn’t a requirement when I signed up several years ago, and to my knowledge, it’s still not required now. Just as long as you keep your email and password in something like a password manager and don’t fuck it up, you’re fine.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, domain names are tied to a person and, even if that person register the domain with fake person details, there will be a digital payment associated with the purchase.

            • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Which also isn’t private. In fact, it’s the opposite of private since it’s a public blockchain.

              • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, I am aware. But nonetheless it is far easier to use anonymously than “traditional” payment. Like, exchanging BTC/LTC from Monero, and buying said Monero via a non-kyc method as well. And whatever protections you want to layer, depending on how much effort you think “they” would spend on you.

  • yolo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Upon receiving the recovery email from Proton Mail, Spanish authorities further requested Apple to provide additional details linked to that email, leading to the identification of the individual.

    I like how no ones talking about how Apple (the one its fanboys say is most privacy centric company) was the one that helped identity the individual.

    • azalty@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Proton leaked the recovery email. Apple has never given any guarantee about their mail service, which isn’t the case of Proton

      Don’t put any recovery info on Proton

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t put any recovery info on Proton

        About that. I’m still making the transition from gmail and currently most of my mail still goes to gmail first and gets forwarded to Proton through their easy switch process. Surely this is just as up for grabs as a recovery email, right?

        FWIW I’m not likely to be investigated any time soon so I’m not worried either way.

        • Spedwell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s significantly worse privacy-wise, since Google gets a copy of everything.

          A recovery email in this case was used to uncover the identity of the account-holder. Unless you’re using proton mail anonymously (if you’re replacing your personal gmail, then probably not) then you don’t need to consider the recover email as a weakness.

          • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s significantly worse privacy-wise, since Google gets a copy of everything.

            Obviously, but I still haven’t gone through all the things I’ve ever signed up to and changed my email to the proton one. When I sign up to new stuff I use Proton, this is a necessary step for transition… And one that is likely to stay in place for a very long time since I’m going to keep procrastinating it.

            Unless you’re using proton mail anonymously then you don’t need to consider the recover email as a weakness.

            Excellent point.

  • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know much about the case beyond some very lazy peripheral searching, but it strikes me that Proton’s compliance isn’t an issue, but the requests themselves are totally unjustifiable and based on malicious prosecutions to nab some separatists on ridiculous terrorism charges for their nonviolent action and protests.

    This individual is suspected of being a member of the Mossos d’Esquadra (Catalonia’s police force) and of using their internal knowledge to assist the Democratic Tsunami movement.

    The requests were made under the guise of anti-terrorism laws, despite the primary activities of the Democratic Tsunami involving protests and roadblocks, which raises questions about the proportionality and justification of such measures.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably the request to Proton arrived from a Swiss judge, who received a request from Spanish judge, and he evaluated the request and decided that it has merit.

    • sudneo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The same thing which happened in the past. Antiterrorism laws used for -if I remember correctly - and environmental activist.

  • Pohl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Privacy” means two different things depending on the audience. For me privacy means that my information is not being used to advance some organizations commercial interest. For others it means that my information will never be shared with a government.

    Don’t advertise to me

    Or

    Don’t narc on me

    I guess I don’t really expect a company to resist pressure from government agencies on my behalf. Especially if I have been using their service to commit crimes in my country. If you are doing things your government would prefer you didn’t, hire a good lawyer and consult with them about what should be sent via email (spoiler, it’s nothing). The mafia doesn’t send emails, or put anything in writing, if you do crimes, you shouldn’t either.

  • TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Doesn’t look like Proton did anything wrong, they can’t fight these requests and he was caught by identifying information he linked to his account.

  • Im_old@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Proton a few years ago disclosed the IP address of the user of a certain mailbox upon request by LEA. That was enough to get the person found and arrested (I don’t remember what the case was about). They HAVE to comply with these requests, but they DON’T need to log/retain those info ETA: and I was wrong, thanks @Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works to set me straight. But I think the point still stands. I don’t want to be ALWAYS be tied to a VPN, there are some scenarios where I can’t use a VPN.

    That was the moment I decided to selfhost my email server.

    • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      In that particular case they did need to log the ip because they were compelled to do so by a Swiss court.

      That was an opsec failure on the user, if they used a VPN or Tor they would not have been caught.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        A VPN would’ve only shifted the “blame” unless it was a decent one like IVPN.

        Tor would’ve been much better, especially considering Proton has an .onion address.

        • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, by VPN I meant something decent. Not whatever spyware is top on the Play Store for circumventing geoblocks.

          They were already using Proton Mail, they just were probably thinking that was enough. It would have been if the French had not been able to convince a Swiss court that their request was valid.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Posteo doesn’t have to retain IPs and doesn’t, it also doesn’t retain payment info (though if you transfer by wire there’s still a window where a payment can be traced AFAIU).

      They will also absolutely forward any and all traffic for a particular account to law enforcement when given a court order. What’s it with criminals thinking that they can outsource opsec to legitimate businesses. Defending against a state-level actor actively hunting you down, watching closely and pouncing on any and every mistake, is a vastly different beast than making sure google doesn’t know about the butt plug you just bought.

      • Im_old@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agree with you, that’s why I buy my butt plugs (and similar toys) with my gmail account! 😁

  • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    What I am find curious about this is if a recovery email would have any weight in court. I can add whatever recovery email I want to an account. It doesn’t have to be mine.

  • taanegl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is why you sign and encrypt the contents of email. If the recipient doesn’t have the public key, they can’t read the content.

    Allowing a service provider to “handle your keys” is tantamount to letting the fox watch the henhouse.

    Proton doesn’t provide IMAP/SMTP access for free accounts, so you won’t be able to encrypt emails locally.

    This ultimately is the tech version of “trust me bro”. This means you are as secure on Proton as you are on GMail, depending upon how you use the service.

    • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Proton doesn’t provide IMAP/SMTP access for free accounts, so you won’t be able to encrypt emails locally

      Umm, you absolutely can. Use gpg, encrypt the txt, copy the encrypted text into the email. EZPZ.

      • taanegl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        …yes, that’s what I said. But sign them locally. Do not put your private key on Protons service. Sign and distribute pub keys locally.

        Probably should have clarified.

        Also, paid IMAP/SMTP makes Proton a freemium service. Thought I should just underline that.

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      FYI email contents were not decrypted or turned over to police, as far as I know Proton’s E2EE is still as good as whatever system you’re using. Proton doesn’t have the keys to decrypt your emails, it never did. What they have access to is metadata that is necessary to function when your private key is unavailable - e.g. your public encryption key used to encrypt incoming emails from non-Proton sources, or in this case, a recovery email address (I don’t know what the recovery process entails and whether it can restore encrypted emails).

    • sudneo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This comment is completely off the mark. The information that they disclosed is the recovery email -the same exact thing which happened previously- not any content of any email.

      Also, proton does encryption with PGP, but you can’t encrypt if the other side doesn’t use PGP (which is the case for 99.98% of humans on the planet). If they do, proton supports this including with arbitrary clients using their bridge.