• sramder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    8 months ago

    The article pretty plainly says the guy was coerced into entering his password. So the headline feels a bit manipulative.

      • indog@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        So he was “only” coerced, ie likely verbally abused and lied to (which cops are allowed to do) about the consequences of refusing to unlock, instead of being physically forced. Such freedom.

          • indog@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            “The general consensus has been that there is more Fifth Amendment protection for passwords than there is for biometrics,” Andrew Crocker, the Surveillance Litigation Director at the EFF, told Gizmodo in a phone interview. “The 5th Amendment is centered on whether you have to use the contents of your mind when you’re being asked to do something by the police and turning over your password telling them your password is pretty obviously revealing what’s in your mind.”

      • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Lemmy quality descended quite quickly. What’s the more intelligent tech community alternative besides hacker news?

        It seems everything descends into this samey mess of america bad, eat the rich which I don’t dispute with but I am here for tech and not politics honestly. Time and place for everything.

        The amount of low effort comments that seem to only be about points/validation which aren’t even visible for some is tiring.

        It used to be that you would look into comments for useful information about the posted article. Now you can skip the comments altogether and the posted links quality also became questionable.

        I miss times where you could find links to some niche but full of creativity/usefulness websites in the comments or posts. Those juicy gems of the web. Or learn some fact that you had no idea about.

        I want to learn something new being here. Not make my brain feel good with the reward of validation.

        • Masterblaster420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          and this is why lemmy is a limp-wristed do-nothing. too many people here want to stick their head in the sand. but by all means, pls share some more star trek memes.

          • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I mean I have curated my ‘All’ only to non world news and non memes comms and I was left with literally nothing except this community. There is literally nothing here :/

            I will still keep using it whenever I can though just out of principle and to curb some of my Reddit addictions.

            I am sorry to say nowadays 95% of content appears to be meaningless. Not contributing anything, not creative, not even funny lots of the times. I won’t sugar coat this

              • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                See I have this weird feeling that we are too different to even connect somehow. You didn’t even read my comment. Any benefit of doubt of mine is pointless when you just throw some out of place, bland one liner and don’t even want to discuss anything. It’s like talking to a wall

                • Masterblaster420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t want to have a discussion. I want to unify a disgruntled public so we can make change for the better. Get friends if you just want to have a discussion. All I’m here to do is to get you to say it with me:

                  EAT. THE. RICH.

                  • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Too niche platform to waste your energy for that imo. Twitter or Reddit have way more range. That’s where all the political campaigns happen. And successfully so

    • indog@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      However, the panel said the evidence from his phone was lawfully acquired “because it required no cognitive exertion, placing it in the same category as a blood draw or a fingerprint taken at booking…"

      If the precedent is that unlocking the phone is the same category as fingerprint taking, well, what happens if you refuse to be “coerced” into having your prints taken? Even if the legal precedent isn’t fully understood, it looks like the reasoning here isn’t based on whether there was physical force applied, but whether the search required the contents of the person’s mind.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I do t know about fingerprints but I thought a blood draw required cooperation or court order

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          In many (if not most) US jurisdictions, operating a vehicle under a driver’s license specifically implies consent to a blood draw when under suspicion of impaired driving.